Cited by

Probable cause exists where, “on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotations omitted).

“When reviewing a pretrial order on a motion to suppress, [appellate courts] review the district court’s determination of probable cause de novo.”

(quoting Zanter, d at 631-32) (other quotation omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotations omitted).

“When reviewing a pretrial order on a motion to suppress, we review the district court’s determination of probable cause de novo.”

On review, we determine “whether there was a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed.” d 666, 673 (Minn. 2015) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

-75 (Minn. 2015) (using defendant’s cellphone data to determine whether he was near his wife when she was murdered).

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 240 (1983) (noting that magistrates have the authority “to draw such reasonable inferences as [they] will from the material supplied to [them] by applicants for a warrant”).

First, nothing in the affidavit states that the conversation between the neighbor and the officer occurred over the phone and “[o]ur inquiry is limited to the information presented in the affidavit.”

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“On review, we must determine whether there was a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed.” State v. Holland , 6 (quotation omitted).

“A [search] warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“A [search] warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotations omitted).

“A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” 5 (quotations omitted).

And finally, the object’s incriminating nature must be immediately apparent.” (quotations omitted).

State v. Holland , (quotations and citations omitted).

d 666, 671 (Minn. 2015).

But a general standard exists: “A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on the 5 totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraba nd or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).

Wong Sun v. United States , 371 U.S. 471, 487-88, 83 S. Ct. 407, 417 (1963); (citing Wong Sun).

5 “A warrant is supported by probable cause if, on th e totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” State v. Holland , (quotation omitted).

-69, 672, 675-76 (Minn. 2015).

A temporary seizure may be permissible under the Fourth Amendment “when needed to preserve evidence until police are able to obtain a warrant.” , 670 n.3 (Minn. 2015).

A temporary seizure may be permissible under the Fourth Amendment “when needed to preserve evidence until police are able to obtain a warrant.” n.3 (Minn. 2015).

d 666, 671 (Minn. 2015) (citing Milton, d at 799) (emphasis added).

d 666, 673 (Minn. 2015) (quotations omitted).

(listing the criteria of the plain-view exception: (1) the officer be lawfully in the position from which the item is in plain view, (2) the officer has a lawful right of access to the item, and (3) the incriminating nature of the item be immediately apparent to the officer).

at 331, 337; n.3 (Minn. 2015) (citing cases in which exigent circumstances justified a “temporary seizure”).