Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lapoint v. Orthodontics, 892 N.W.2d 506.

27 citing documents.

JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., –14 (Minn. 2017).
A25-0341 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Orthodontics, P.A., -13 (Minn. 2017) (analyzing sex-based pregnancy-discrimination claim under MHRA in context of decision not to hire); Anderson v. Aitkin Pharm.
Samantha Wakasugi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In re the Estate of Mark G. Andersen, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted) (noting that the fact-finder “has the advantage of hearing the testimony, assessing relative credibility of witnesses and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances unique to the matter before it”).
Mariam Aromashodu, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson, Minn. 2022
Kera Quinn, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted) (noting that the fact -finder “has the advantage of hearing the testimony, assessing relative credibility of witnesses and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances unique to the matter before it”).
In re The Robert Preus and Donna Mae Preus Lake Property Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment Minn. 2021
(citation omitted); see LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (explaining the deference due to a factfinder who “ ‘has the advantage’ ” of hearing the testimony, assess ing credibility, and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances at issue (citation omitted)).
Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A finding is clearly erroneous when we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of f act are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Ronald Lee Henrichs, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Revocable Trust Agreement of Avis V. Cordes under agreement dated February 12, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of fact 7 are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P .A., (quotation omitted).
Ben Tahja, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01; see also LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Assata Kenneh, Minn. 2020
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Brian J. Henel, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
Sarah Dickhausen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See LaPoint 13 v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Maxim Kenneth Rhone. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Yolanda Majors, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Nicole LaPoint, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
LaFayette Temple, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.