Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lapoint v. Orthodontics, 892 N.W.2d 506.

27 citing documents.

JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., –14 (Minn. 2017).
Daniel Engebretson v. Northern Tool and Equipment Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Orthodontics, P.A., -13 (Minn. 2017) (analyzing sex-based pregnancy-discrimination claim under MHRA in context of decision not to hire); Anderson v. Aitkin Pharm.
Samantha Wakasugi v. 3M Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George Badeaux Minn. Ct. App. 2024
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota on Related Appeal (A23-0373) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota on Related Appeal (A23-0373) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George Badeaux Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In re the Estate of Mark G. Andersen, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted) (noting that the fact-finder “has the advantage of hearing the testimony, assessing relative credibility of witnesses and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances unique to the matter before it”).
Mariam Aromashodu v. Swarovski North America Limited, et al., Airport Retail Group, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson Minn. 2022
Kera Quinn v. LMC NE Minneapolis Holdings, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted) (noting that the fact -finder “has the advantage of hearing the testimony, assessing relative credibility of witnesses and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances unique to the matter before it”).
In re The Robert Preus and Donna Mae Preus Lake Property Family Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment Minn. 2021
(citation omitted); see LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (explaining the deference due to a factfinder who “ ‘has the advantage’ ” of hearing the testimony, assess ing credibility, and acquiring a thorough understanding of the circumstances at issue (citation omitted)).
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Elizabeth Namarra, Issiaka Traore Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A finding is clearly erroneous when we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Ann Humphreys Sellers v. Janet Humphreys Krasner Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of f act are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Ronald Lee Henrichs v. Charlene Lila Henrichs Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Revocable Trust Agreement of Avis V. Cordes under agreement dated February 12, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of fact 7 are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P .A., (quotation omitted).
Ben Tahja, et al v. Vanessa Autio, Daniel Autio, Autio Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01; see also LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Assata Kenneh, Minn. 2020
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Brian J. Henel v. Rosario Salas, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A., (quotation omitted).
Sarah Dickhausen, Charlotte Parayno v. St. Paul Public Schools, et al., Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laura Diane Hermer v. Lawrence James Cisek, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See LaPoint 13 v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Maxim Kenneth Rhone Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Yolanda Majors v. Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.
Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A Minn. Ct. App. 2018
LaFayette Temple v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P.A.