DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wheeler v. State, 909 N.W.2d 558.

68 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    appeal directly to this court.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2004), overruled on other grounds by Wheeler v. State
  • Jetaun Helen Wheeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
  • Minn. 2020
    “Under the de novo standard, we do not defer to the analysis of the courts below, but instead we exercise independent review.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    accounted for by the standard voluntariness inquiry.” Wheeler v. State
  • Felix Kasper Piah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    overruled on other grounds by Wheeler v. State
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • Shonwta D. Jackson, Minn. 2019
    Wheeler v. State , n.8 (Minn. 2018) (holding that an issue was forfeited when it was not raised before the court of appeals or in the appellant’s petition for review); (“Appellant did not raise this argument before the court of appeals.
  • William Marcus Daniel Edwards, petitioner Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State v. Hallmark 927 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 2019
  • State v. Hallmark 927 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 2019
    State v. Andrews , 282 Minn. 386 , , 532 n.4 (1969) ; see Wheeler v. State , , 564 (Minn. 2018) (noting that "plea bargain[ing]" is "a discretionary function [of prosecutors], not an obligation").
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    & n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (holding that defendant could challenge guilty plea for first time on appeal when challenge was based on matters 9 of record and no material-fact dispute existed)
  • Windsor v. Comm'r of Pub. Safety 921 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
  • Windsor v. Comm'r of Pub. Safety 921 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    567-69 (Minn. 2018) (overruling court of appeals' per se rule that any time a district court improperly injects itself into plea negotiations a guilty plea is invalid and remanding to allow defendant to develop a factual record regarding the voluntariness of her plea).
  • Dominique Salatheia Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    er oath at the time of his guilty plea”); (rejecting postconviction petitioner’s argument that attorney’s failure to advise the defendant of sentencing ramifications demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel when the petitioner’s claim was contradicted by her plea hearing testimony)
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    See State v. Anyanwu , & n. 1 (Minn. App. 2004) (holding that defendant could challenge guilty plea for first time on appeal when challenge was based entirely on matters of record and no material -fact dispute exist ed), overruled by Wheeler v. State
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    See Wheeler v. State , -64, 568 n. 7 (Minn. 2018) (recognizing that Fed.
  • Overruled Rufus Cornelius Loyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    at the time of the hearing, the state believed Anyanwu to be valid.