Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webster, 894 N.W.2d 782.

175 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kenwan Deshawn Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenwan Deshawn Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Scott Gunderson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Eric Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Scott Gunderson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Eric Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Demetrius Antonio Wynne Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Demetrius Antonio Wynne Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.02, however, creates an exception to the forfeiture doctrine that allows an appellate court to consider a forfeited error when the defendant establishes (1) an error, (2) that was plain, and (3) that affected the defendant’s substantial rights.” 11 (citing Lilienthal, d at 785).
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Wilford Fields, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We note that while the jury-instruction guides are not binding law, n.1 (Minn. 2005), this instruction is consistent with the statute and “does not contravene existing case law,”
State of Minnesota v. Terrance Frelix, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sherif Mohamed Abdeltawwab Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sherif Mohamed Abdeltawwab Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rred in its stalking instructions by instructing the jury that it “need not agree as to which criminal acts were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” In order to satisfy the plain-error standard, a party must show that the error was plain, meaning that “it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel James Lewison Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Daniel James Lewison Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We must assume that the jury “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Dwayne Thurston Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Micheal Lee Cocuzzi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Micheal Lee Cocuzzi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Dwayne Thurston Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Eh Doh Par Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Eh Doh Par Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Olok Lero Olok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Error is plain when it “is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Abdi Dahir Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An error is plain if it is “clear or obvious,” such as if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Carlos Rosas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An error is “plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or standard of conduct.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Dennis Bromen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Paul Casey Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Carolina Zarate Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A. Yes, the Court did.” We conclude that , even if the district court erred when it admitted testimony about what the district court said at the HRO hearing, any error was not “plain.” “An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a ru le, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Jacob Bonin Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An error is “plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or standard of conduct.’” (quoting Kelley, d at 277).
State of Minnesota v. Kyle James Itkonen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Dejahn Akeem Wiley-Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will not deem an error “plain” unless “it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Corey Duane Warner Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Sean Anthony Porter Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that an error is plain if it is clear or obvious, meaning the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct) (quotation omitted).
Deshon Israel Bonnell, Minn. 2022
d 232, 239 (Minn. 2002); –86 (Minn. 2017) (noting that this court only needed to analyze “causal relationship” because “the requisite time and distance between the attempted aggravated robbery and the killing” were not at issue).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Douglas Capshaw Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kevin John LeClair Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) ().
State of Minnesota v. Randall Jermaine Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Israel Frederick Elder Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Under this standard, we must “adopt the view of the evidence most favorable to the state” and assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Leonte Laray High Town Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotati ons omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abraham Palma Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kymone Leandre Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota vs Jason Peter Bird Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Steven John Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Scott Wade Ramey Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Larry Duane Lucas, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christina Lee Bohnstedt Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, vs Christian Douglas Baron Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Blas Palma-Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes ca se law, a rule, or a st andard of conduct.” (quotation and citation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. R. C.-A., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is 5 typically established if the error contravenes ca se law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Raymon Wainner Minn. Ct. App. 2021