Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webster, 894 N.W.2d 782.

175 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Chase Michael Schwendeman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typica lly established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Stephen Schuety Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of 23 conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious’” by “‘contraven[ing] case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” State v. Webster , (d 294, 302 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Paul Langner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“[a]n error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes […] a rule”).
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Keith Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Grant Lloyd Greenwood v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Corey David Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes caselaw, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Bruce Edward Canady Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious.” (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Chukwuebuke Ineh Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An error is plain when it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kim Dale Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An error is plain if it is “‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of cond uct.’” State v. Webster , (quoting Ramey, d at 302).
State of Minnesota v. Tywan Rulford Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious.” State v. Webster, 4 (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Timothy J. Otis Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Casimir Robert Krithers Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Vinson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (Mi nn.
State of Minnesota v. James Zlanworse Seekie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 782, 78 6 (Minn. 2017) (explaining that if an y requirement of plain -error doctrine is unsatisfied, we need not consider remaining requirements).
State of Minnesota v. Otto Rene Gonzalez Bautista Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Deonte Darnell Lawson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Eric Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Under the second prong, “[a]n e rror is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. 11 Webster, (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ayodele Mayowa Ojo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear and obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Danielle Yvonne Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if th e error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Juanel Anthony Mikulak Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Eithan Armani Green Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abdulla Ibn Kaabar Venson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo nmn Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes ca se law, a rule, or a st andard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lee Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lee Andrew Bolton Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Error that Was Plain An error is plain “if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) ().
State of Minnesota v. Zachariah Steven Marczak Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An error is plain “if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically esta blished ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” State v. Webster , ( quoting Ramey, d at 302).
State of Minnesota v. James Allen Buck Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Lee Daniel Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Jo Huntington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Earl Jay Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. John Melvin Karnes Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Raynold Sleen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Moreover, “[a]n error is plain if it is clear or obvious, ” meaning that “the error contrav enes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , , 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes ca se law, a rule, or a st andard of conduct.” 4 State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Sandra Kay Kouba Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An error is plain if it “contravenes caselaw, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ethan James Cook Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Kent David Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Edward Gary Kowalzyk Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Error is plain when it “is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ayanna Laverne Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Plain error is one that was clear or obvious, which may be the case if the error “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Travares Ladell Cyrus Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Error is plain when it “is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standar d of conduct.” State v. Webster , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Bradly James Haddock Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Error is plain when it “is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Felix Antonio Rayford Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The reviewing court assumes that the jury “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Gellis Lee Walton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“When a defendant fail s to object at trial, the forfeiture doctrine generally precludes appellate relief.”
State of Minnesota v. Trezjaun Caprise Sims Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An error is plain if it is cl ear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tory Larae Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The appellate court must assume that the trier of fact “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any con tradictory evidence.”
State v. Bauer 932 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Bauer 932 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Webster , , 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).