Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webster, 894 N.W.2d 782.

175 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Alexander Gogoi Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established 12 ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Dean Potter Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Terence Duane Maurstad Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tony Dean Boos Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(concluding no plain error because the supreme court had not “clearly” ruled that un-objected-to appellate issue constituted an error).
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Robert Simmons Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“If we conclude that any of the requirements of the plain-error doctrine are not satisfied, we need not consider the others.”).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. 2026
This “is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jaisden Harold-Dru Hanners Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Jaisden Harold-Dru Hanners Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In performing this analysis, we assume the jury “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Deanna Lea King Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jamaal Terrance Tanna Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An error is clearly contrary to law if “it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Shane Allen Saarela Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ahmed Mohamed Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Roberto Ortega-Herrera Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes [caselaw], a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. J. C. L., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. J. C. L., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abdusalam Omar Hussein Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Abdusalam Omar Hussein Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(concluding that the district court did not plainly err by giving a jury instruction because the instruction was consistent with the pattern instruction and did “not contravene existing case law”).
State of Minnesota v. Tyrel Traverse Ambuehl Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Terry Soloman Price Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” (quoting Ramey, d at 302).
State of Minnesota v. Djamil Vagif Abiyev Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jacob James Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lonny Slade Glover Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” d 782, 787 (Minn. 2017) (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Victor Zuniga Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Kurtis Lindquist Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Danielle Marie Tarbuck Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Rashad Odell Collins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But we see no plain error, which is an error typically established when it is clear or obvious because it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jonathan Deloye Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Amal Mohamed Osman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“If we conclude that any of the requirements of the plain- error doctrine are not satisfied, we need not consider the others.”).
State of Minnesota v. Letrell Marqueete Baggett Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious.”
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Focusing on the second prong of the plain-error standard, “[a]n error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Artshayia Monia Pargo Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” Despite concluding there was plain error, the supreme court held that the error was not prejudicial because there was overwhelming evidence of guilt and the “battering parent syndrome” testimony reflected only a small portion of the state’s case.
State of Minnesota v. Carlos Ramone Sargent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Ge Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” 3 Yang appeals only the first-degree criminal sexual conduct conviction.
State of Minnesota v. Peter Michael Dziuk Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Drew Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Cody Michael Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lamarquita Gesine Leach Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Walter Hermel Mendez Cabrera Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In deference to the jury, we assume that it “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gregory Roth Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Ivan Shines Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation 1 We note that the parties dispute the applicable standard of review.
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Marlon Curtis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
4 This case is nonprecedential and, therefore, not binding.
State of Minnesota v. Tracey Dee Keyes Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ which is typically established ‘if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Joseph William Curtis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious, which is typically established if the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This testimony supports a reasonable inference of intent to terrorize because it shows that Niesen used violence by pulling the victim by her 3 We note that, although the jury-instruction guides are not binding law, n.1 (Minn. 2005), this instruction is consistent with the statute and “does not contravene existing case law,”