Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Baertsch v. Baertsch, 886 N.W.2d 235.

42 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Conduct-based fees may be based on a party’s pursuit of “frivolous or bad-faith claims.”
In Re the Marriage of Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[C]onduct-based attorney fees are to be based on the party’s behavior occurring during the litigation process.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Conduct-based fees may be based on a party’s pursuit of “frivolous or bad-faith claims.”
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But we have consistently held that conduct-based fees are based on behavior “during the litigation process.” (citing Geske, d at 819).
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
2 “A motion for conduct-based attorney fees may be based on the opposing party’s pursuit of frivolous or bad-faith claims.”
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The party requesting such fees “has the burden to show that the conduct of the other party unreasonably contributed to the length or expense of the proceeding.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A motion for conduct-based attorney fees may be based on the opposing party ’s pursuit of frivolous or bad-faith claims.”
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, conduct-based attorney fees are to be based on the party’s behavior during the litigation process.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(finding the time for appeal had not commenced after the district court granted husband’s motion for conduct-based attorney fees but had not yet entered judgment as to the amount).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Under Minnesota Statutes section 518.14, subdivision 1, a district court may “in its discretion,” award “additional fees, costs and disbursements against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.” “Generally, conduct- based attorney fees are to be based on the party’s behavior occurring during the litigation process.”
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, conduct-based attorney fees are to be based on the party’s behavior occurring during the litigation process.” (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Kiran Kumar Arise v. Anjali Naresh Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Kiran Kumar Arise v. Anjali Naresh Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 (2022); -39 (Minn. App. 2016).
In re the Marriage of: Richard Leo Bassing, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1, provides in applicable part that “the court shall make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct.” 9 proceedings under Minnesota Statutes chapters 518 and 518A.” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Sneha Singh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Margaret A. Flolid Trust Agreement Dated December 12, 1994. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
P. 11.03(b)(1) ; see also Baertsch v. Baertsch
A21-1064 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Custody of: C. W. P.; William James Peck, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Baertsch v. Baertsch , (M inn.
Sokkhan Ka, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Amanda Jo Briggs, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1, has the burden to show that the conduct of the other party unreasonably contributed to the length or expense of the proceeding.”
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Custody of: C.A.M., Cody A. Myers, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
” Baertsch v. Baertsch , ().
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A motion for conduct-bas ed attorney fees [under section 518.14] may be based on the opposing party’s pursuit of frivolous or bad-faith claims.”
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[C]onduct-based attorney fees are to be based on the party’s behavior occurring during the litigation process.”
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The party moving for conduct-based a ttorney fees “has the burden to show that the conduct of the other party unreasonably contributed to th e length or expense of the proceeding.”
A17-0997 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The goal of sanctions is not to punish the offender or to shift fees, but to deter bad faith litigation.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Bradley Jude Domagala, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The party moving for conduct-based attorney fees “has the burden to show that the conduct of the other party unreasonably contributed to the length 11 or expense of the proceeding.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“[A] party moving for conduct- based attorney fees .
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1; -39 (Minn. App. 2016) (providing examples of conduct that may justify an award, such as noncompliance with discovery, pursuit of frivolous or bad- faith claims, or behavior occurring during th e litigation process).