Cited by

McInnis also criticizes the district court for relying on the absence of evidence of retaliation from C.R., or anyone else at the scene, –74 (Minn. App. 2019) (“[T]he absence of evidence in the record regarding a certain circumstance does not constitute a circumstance proved.”).

(“Arguments are forfeited if they are presented in a summary and conclusory form, do not cite to applicable law, and fail to analyze the law when claiming that errors of law occurred.” (quotation omitted)).

-77 (Minn. App. 2001) (stating pro se litigants generally held to sa me standards as attorneys and conclusory arguments that cite no applicable law are forfeited).

Appellate courts “will not overturn a conviction based on circumstantial evidence on the basis of mere conjecture.”

“This is because the State’s burden is not to remove all doubt but to remove all reasonable doubt.” (quotation omitted).

State v. German , d 466, 475 (Minn. App. 2019).

-74 (Minn. App. 2019) (holding that “the a bsence of evidence in the record regardi ng a certain circumstance does not constitute a circumstance proved”).

See Ortega, d at 100; -74 (Minn. App. 2019).