Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. German, 929 N.W.2d 466.

77 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Paul David Trott Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Circumstances proved include evidence that supports the finding of guilt and uncontroverted testimony of a state witness that is “not necessarily contradictory to the verdict.”
State of Minnesota v. Jermaine Kershawn Perry Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Deshawn Misters Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Brian Adam Burba Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Norbert Pius D’Cruz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Carl Joseph Matusovic Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Cermor Rio Boakai Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Roger Bruce Nahl Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Emilio Nieto Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Freddie Tyrone Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Criticized State of Minnesota Minn. 2021
McInnis also criticizes the district court for relying on the absence of evidence of retaliation from C.R., or anyone else at the scene, –74 (Minn. App. 2019) (“[T]he absence of evidence in the record regarding a certain circumstance does not constitute a circumstance proved.”).
State of Minnesota v. James Edward Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Terrvante Rennicko Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Eric Clayton Nord Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“Arguments are forfeited if they are presented in a summary and conclusory form, do not cite to applicable law, and fail to analyze the law when claiming that errors of law occurred.” (quotation omitted)).
Robert Webb, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Anthony Keith Meister v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Halana Debra Louise Harris Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Antwan Darnell Cosey Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-77 (Minn. App. 2001) (stating pro se litigants generally held to sa me standards as attorneys and conclusory arguments that cite no applicable law are forfeited).
State of Minnesota v. Ramon Rosevelt Blakey Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Appellate courts “will not overturn a conviction based on circumstantial evidence on the basis of mere conjecture.”
State of Minnesota v. Chinomso Emmanuel Onuoha Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“This is because the State’s burden is not to remove all doubt but to remove all reasonable doubt.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Deon Dell Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Michael Scott Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. German , d 466, 475 (Minn. App. 2019).
State of Minnesota v. Troy Michael Wierson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-74 (Minn. App. 2019) (holding that “the a bsence of evidence in the record regardi ng a certain circumstance does not constitute a circumstance proved”).
State of Minnesota v. Larhonda Betty Spiller Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Ortega, d at 100; -74 (Minn. App. 2019).