DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Ludwigson v. Ludwigson, 642 N.W.2d 441.

56 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“The allocation of federal-tax exemptions is within the [district] court’s discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We will affirm a district court’s findings on income “if those findings have a reasonable basis in fact and are not clearly erroneous.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Ludwigson v. Ludwigson , d 441, 446 (Minn. App. 2002) .
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We will affirm a district court’s findings on gross income “if those findings have a reasonable basis in fact and are not clearly erroneous.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
21 clearly erroneous.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“The allocation of federal-tax exemptions is within the [district] court’s discretion.”).
Ryan Gary Sanford, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
James David Colburn, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“The allocation of federal-tax exemptions is within the [district] court’s discretion.”).
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
18, 1999); (“The allocation of federal-tax exemptions is within the [district] court’s discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Angela Marie Backman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
at 826; -49 (Minn. App. 2002).
In re the Marriage of: Carrie Ann Roth, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Linsey Lee Milbrandt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Sundbom Otterson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The allocation of the federal-tax exemptions is within the [d istrict] court’s discretion.”
County of Dakota, ex rel., Michelle Marie Hinz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jessica Lin Love, n/k/a/ Jessica Lin Lopez Love, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nicole A. Nyhus, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-49 (Minn. App. 2002) (“[A] court does not always need to make separate findings to award attorney fees based on need.”).
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Marie Owens, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-46 6 (Minn. App. 2002).
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The allocation of the federal-tax exemptions is within the [district] court’s discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 441, 446 (Minn. App. 2002).
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Custody of WNM: Peter Edward Marxen v. Janet Ruth Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Custody of WNM: Peter Edward Marxen v. Janet Ruth Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review a district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and conclusions of law de novo, review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ramsey County v. Yee Lee 770 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Ramsey County v. Yee Lee 770 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
at 324; -46 (Minn.App.2002) (standards for reviewing a district court decision and a child support magistrate’s decision are the same).
Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger 699 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger 699 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Gerber v. Gerber 694 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Gerber v. Gerber 694 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2005