Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mix, 646 N.W.2d 247.
- State of Minnesota v. Dayonne Marquis Lachapelle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Dayonne Marquis Lachapelle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court “abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, w ithout justification, or in contravention of the law.” State v. Mix , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A [district] court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court “abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, w ithout justification, or in contravention of the law.” State v. Mix , review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court abuses its discretion when “it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.” , review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 247, 250 (Minn. App. 2002) (“A court abuses its discretion when it acts .
-
A16-1804
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A [district] court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.” State v. Mix , review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Neil Ackland Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Robert Neil Ackland
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The district court “abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.”
- Tony Lee Love v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Tony Lee Love v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-10 (Minn. 1997) (stating that clearly erroneous factual findings constitute an abuse of discretion); (illustrating that a district “court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of law”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. C. H. T. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. C. H. T.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, without justification, or in contravention of the law.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
State v. Meredyk
754 N.W.2d 596
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(“A court abuses its discretion when it acts ...