Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335.

91 citing documents.

Jacob Schlichter, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen , (concluding that the city council’s passing vote on a motion to reconsider an application was valid, despite a procedural irregularity).
BC Seva, LLC, d/b/a Suburban Studios, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, n.3 (Minn. 1984).
ROA Rochester, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
City of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, n.3 (Minn. 1984)).
EP Land LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
In the Matter of Stevens County for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, the CUP should be reversed.
Minn. 2023
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, see Mendota Golf, (“[W]e narrowly construe any restrictions that a zoning ordinance imposes upon a property owner.”); see also 3 Kenneth H. Young, Anderson’s American Law of Zoning § 18.04 (4th rev. ed. 1996) (“The consistent emphas
City of Shorewood, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, n.3 (Minn. 1984).
City of Long Prairie, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Residents A ss’n v. City of Chanhassen , n.3 (Minn. 1984).
Ellsworth Fretham, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen , n.3 (Minn. 1984).
Richard T. Jellinger, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Ordinances are construed according to the recognized principles of statutory construction.” Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’ n v. City of Chanhassen , d 335, 339, n.3 (Minn. 1984) .
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We do so de novo, Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass’n v. City of Minneapolis , while applying statutory interpretation principles, Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, n.3 (Minn. 1984).
In re An Order Finding Certain Facts and Ordering the Denial of a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, (explaining tha t denial of a CUP “must be base d on something more concrete than neighborhood op position and expressions of concer n for public safety and welfare”).
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Cloud , , 73 (Minn. 2012) ) ); Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen , , 339 (Minn. 1984) ("When the words of a statute or ordinance in their application to an existing situation are clear and free from ambiguity, judicial construction is inappropriate."
State v. Decker 916 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 2018
In re Order Approving the Application by DG Minnesota CSG 2, LLC for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, d 335, 340 (Minn. 1984).
LeRoy J. Rossow, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Citizen All., d at 94 (quotation omitted); see also Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights , (“Generally, [appellate courts] narrowly construe any restrictions that a zoning ordinance imposes upon a property owner.”); Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, (“[A] zoning ordinance is in derogation of the common law and should be construed strictly against the city and in favor of the property owner.”).
Eureka Township, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, n.3 (Minn. 1984).
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
Distinguished RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
evidence was insufficient to reverse the grant of a conditional use permit where the neighborhood organization only offered “non-specific testimony that the proposed [use] poses potential traffic hazards at the intersection,” while the city offered “the city engineer’s testimony that the intersection could handle the anticipated traffic.” Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, (considering several sections of an ordinance in defining term at issue); Christensen v. State, Dep’t of Conservation, Game & Fish, 285 Minn. 493, 499-500 , (considering act as a whole and relevant statutory provisions in construing statute at issue).
City of East Bethel v. Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 798 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of East Bethel v. Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 798 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, (Chanhassen); Christensen v. State, Dep’t of Conservation, Game & Fish, 285 Minn. 493, 499-500
State v. Holmes 787 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Holmes 787 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
In Re Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
In re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
In re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
See Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, , 339 n. 3 (Minn.1984).
In Re Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
State v. Johnson 775 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Johnson 775 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
Eagle Lake of Becker County Lake Ass'n v. Becker County Board of Commissioners 738 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Eagle Lake of Becker County Lake Ass'n v. Becker County Board of Commissioners 738 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Ordinances are construed according to the recognized principles of statutory construction.” Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, , 339 n. 3 (Minn.1984).
Bartheld v. County of Koochiching 716 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bartheld v. County of Koochiching 716 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“A [county] may consider neighborhood opposition only if based on concrete information.” Yang, d at 833 ; see also Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, (concluding that generalized or unsupported neighborhood opposition does not, by itself, provide a legally sufficient reason for a CUP denial).
Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista 713 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista 713 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, see also Smith v. Barry, 219 Minn. 182, 187 , (instructing that statute must be considered as whole to harmonize and give effect to all provisions).
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Consequently, “restriction[s] on land use must be clearly expressed.” Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, see also Minn.Stat.
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church 672 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“[D]enial of a conditional use must be based on something more concrete than neighborhood opposition and expressions of concern for public safety and welfare.” Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003