DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carter v. Olmsted County Housing, 574 N.W.2d 725.

50 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Melissa Lopez v. Dakota County Community Development Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tanya Hipkins v. Dakota County Community Development Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Partners in Nutrition d/b/a Partners in Quality Care (PIQC)’s Appeals of MDE’s April 15, 2024 Decision Proposing to … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of the Alleged Misuse of Access to DVS Data by Andrew Brackett Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Minnesota Racing Commission’s Approval of Running Aces Casino, Hotel & Racetrack’s Request to … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Appeal of the Termination of Angela Gibson’s lease under the Family Affordable Housing … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Appeal of the Termination of Angela Gibson’s lease under the Family Affordable Housing … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jacob Robuck, et al v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Auth., (quoting In re Nw.
In the Matter of Robert Estelle’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Robert D. Fineran v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Auth., (concluding that when an HRA receives evidence, hears testimony, and makes a decisi on regarding section 8 be nefits, it acts in a 1 The HRA also argues that it offered an alternative accommodation to Fineran.
In the Matter of Reba Mitchell’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of Sauda Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Kelly Cedarberg v. Dakota County Community Development Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that a housi ng authority’s decision must be based on substantial evidence, defined “as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mi nd might accept as adequate to support a conclusion” (quotation omitted)).
Lisa A. Curtis v. Cloquet/Carlton Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2019
J. Paul Robinson v. University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“an administrative agency cannot, at least over objection, rest its findings of fact solely upon hearsay evidence which is inadmissible in a judicial proceeding,” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted).
Hodan Dirie v. Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Eileen Henderson v. Public Housing Agency of the City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Surer Muse v. Dakota County Community Development Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Tina Stringer v. Public Housing Agency of the City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Auth., ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Douglas Place Treatment Center, LLC v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brent R. Henkel v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brent R. Henkel v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
& Redevelopment Auth., (quotation omitted).
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kimberly G. Baker v. Minnesota State Supreme Court, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kimberly G. Baker v. Minnesota State Supreme Court, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
& Redevelopment Auth., (quotation omitted).
Christine M. Berglund v. Kozlak’s Royal Oak Rest Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Christine M. Berglund v. Kozlak’s Royal Oak Rest Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Auth., (quotation omitted).
Nickijo L. Eichorn v. Itasca County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Distinguished Nickijo L. Eichorn v. Itasca County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Auth., d 725 (Minn. App. 1998), to argue that she is entitled to reversal because the hearing officer made insufficient findings.
Tracy A. Dolin v. Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracy A. Dolin v. Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Auth., (holding that an HRA acted in a quasi-judicial capacity when it took evidence and heard testimony).
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
& Redevelopment Auth., (quotation omitted).
Peterson v. Washington County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 805 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Peterson v. Washington County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 805 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Auth., (quoting White Bear Rod & , 742-43 n. 5 (Minn.1986)).
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
& Redevelopment Auth.
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
& Redevelopment Auth.
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
& Redevelopment Auth., (quotation omitted) (discussing limits on agency discretion).
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
Auth., (reversing decision because evidence offered by the HRA, viewed in light of the record as a whole, does not rise to the level of the substantial evidence necessary to support a termination of [the tenants] section 8 certificate).
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA 686 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA 686 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Housing and Redevelopment Auth., (concluding that an agency acts in a quasi-judicial capacity “[b]y taking evidence and hearing testimony”).