Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc., 676 N.W.2d 672.

125 citing documents.

In re the Trust of Elizabeth A. Ronning & Wallace K. Ronning. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We recognize that district courts are not bound by our nonprecedential opinions, see Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (noting “[nonprecedential opinions] should not be cited by the district court as binding precedent”); however, it is apparent from the district court’s order that the interpretation was based on the language of the trust instrument itself.
Justin Holtzbauer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Id.; see Vlahos v. R&I Const. of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (noting that nonprecedential opinions “rarely contain a full recitation of the facts”).
Charles Matthew Waters, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
employ[] different terms in different subdivisions of the statute if it had intended those subdivisions to have the same effect.” Vlahos v. R&I Const. of Bloomington, Inc. , n.4 (Minn. 2004).
Hodan Dualeh, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Bloomington, Inc., d 672, 676 n.3 (Minn. 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Bloomington, Inc. , n.3 (Minn. 2004); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Erik Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We also note “[t]he danger of miscitation is great because unpublished decisions rarely contain a full recitation of the facts.” Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating unpublished opinions from this court are not precedential).
John Koppi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3(c) (2018); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (pausing “to stress that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals are not precedential” and noting that “[t]he danger of miscitation is great because unpublished decisions rarely contain a full recitation of the facts”).
Michael Thomas Palke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc. , n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
of Bloomington, Inc. , see also Day Masonry, d at 328.
Bruce Andrew Olson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3(c) (2018); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc. , n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that the district court erred “both as a matter of law and as a matter of practice” by relying on an unpublished opinion and “stress[ing] that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals are not precedential” and noting both that “[t]he danger of miscitation [of unpublished opinions]
State v. Sh aka 927 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Sh aka 927 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Bloomington, Inc. , , 676 n.3 (Minn. 2004) ("[U]npublished opinions of the court of appeals are not precedential ...
Joseph Bergeron, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3(c) (2018); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (201 8); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc. , n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
Chester Vernon Jones, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Bloomington, Inc. , n.3 (Minn. 2004).
Adam James Hockenson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004).
Nancy Bach, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004).
Followed In the Matter of the Application of Kimberly Baker. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Bloomington, Inc. , Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2016).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
3(c) (2016); Vlahos v. R&I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004); State v. Porte , n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Robert Lewis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004).
Town Center Office Plaza Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., unit owners began to discover leaks in various locations soon after they moved in.
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., (“[U]npublished opinions of the court of appeals are not precedential .
In re: The Power of Attorney Granted by Virginia G. Taraldson dated August 23, 2007 to Kathleen P. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re: The Power of Attorney Granted by Virginia G. Taraldson dated August 23, 2007 to Kathleen P. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
on Sletto, in which this court applied the vested rights theory to determine appellants’ statutory-warranty claim accrued when “the homeowner discovers, or should have discovered, the builder’s refusal or inability to ensure the home is free from major construction defects,” d at 843 (citing Vlahos v. R&I Const. of Bloomington, 7 Inc., ), Thompson argues her right to receive compensation accrued upon discovery of Loyal’s failure to perform.
State of Minnesota v. Kurt Matthew Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kurt Matthew Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 480A.08 (2014); see also Vlahos v. R&I Const. of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004).
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC 871 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2015
328 Barry Avenue, LLC,Appellant v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. 2015
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC 871 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2015
328 LLC also points to our decision in Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc., to support its position that a cause of action for property damage cannot accrue prior to.
328 Barry Avenue, LLC,Appellant v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. 2015
328 LLC also points to our decision in Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc., to support its position that a cause of action for property damage cannot accrue prior to substantial completion of a construction project.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
3(c) (2012); Vlahos v. R & I Constr., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004); n.1 (Minn. App. 2013).
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Bloomington, Inc., & n.3 (Minn. 2004) (noting that district court’s reliance on unpublished opinion of this court “was misplaced, both as a matter of law and as a matter of practice,” and “stress[ing] that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals are not 12 precedential”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. H. and S. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. H. and S. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Vlahos v. R&I Const. of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004); see also Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. Ct. App. 2015