Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jannetta, 355 N.W.2d 189.

73 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Adam Michael Deutsch Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. James Demetrius Redd Minn. Ct. App. 2025
9 (citing Sgro v. United States, 287 U.S. 206, 210-11 (1932)), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Beth Marie Coolbroth Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Deavion Ladell Beasley, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Souto, d at 750 (stating that facts must be “closely related to the time of the issue of the warrant [] to justify a finding of probable cause at that time” (quotation omitted)); rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Gould Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Gould Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Chad William Buckley Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Chad William Buckley Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Carlos Angelo Casarez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
may probably be found at the present time.” ( rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Kareem Jamar Waites Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Instead, the question must be determined by the circumstances of each case.” (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Steven Edward Hansmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at 750 (citing Sgro v. United States, 287 U.S. 206, 210 (1932)), although courts decline to adopt rigid timelines to determine whether search warrant has grown stale , , rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Jeron Demar Faulkner Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Billy Gene Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 189, 193 (Minn. App. 1984), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. John Edward Yort Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Donald Eugene Degroat, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The law of probable cause prevents the issuance of a search warrant on the basis of vague and uncertain information.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Octarious Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Fettig Minn. Ct. App. 2019
robable cause was not stale because of three-day delay between provision of information by informant and issuance of search warrant); (concluding that probable cause was not stale because of si x-week delay between officers’ receipt of information that defendant was growing marijuana and execution of search warrant); (concluding that probable cause was not stale in “narrow circumstances” of child-abuse case because of two-year delay between time information was received and time of search- warra
State of Minnesota v. Joel Andrew Matz Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Jannetta , review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Brady Ray Veselka Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Tommy Earl Upshaw Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 189, 193 (Minn. App. 1984), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Harley Harlen Bishop Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. DeWald , -47 (Minn. 1990) (concluding that information concerning defendant ’s possession of kitchen knives 22 days earlier was not stale); 92-94 (Minn. App. 1984) ( concluding that information concerning defendant’s possession of sexually explicit photographs of minors two years earlier was not stale), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Paul Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Jan.
Compassion Over Killing, Inc., complainant v. Quality Pork Processors, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Under the fourth amendment, the probable cause to search cannot be established by stale information.” (citing United States v. Steeves , 525 F.2d 33, 37 -38 (8th Cir. 1975)), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Brenda Kay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[T]he probable cause to search cannot be established by stale information.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
Winhaven Court Apartments v. Sally Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Winhaven Court Apartments v. Sally Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A complaint “should recite the essential facts which constitute the elements of the crime and which bring the activity within the scope of the criminal statute.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Adam Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-94 (Minn. App. 1984) (holding that probable cause to search cannot be established by stale information and that one staleness factor to consider is “whether the property sought is easily disposable or transferable”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Vi Doan Huynh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vi Doan Huynh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Probable cause to search exists if the items sought to be seized are “probably connected with certain criminal activity and may probably be found at the present time.”
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
ormation was only relevant to the original unexecuted search warrant in June of 2011” and that “[a]fter that warrant was not executed, the information became stale.” In determining whether information supporting a search warrant is stale, the issuing judge must apply “practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
749-50 , the affidavit also must supply proof of facts so closely related in time to the issuance of the search warrant as to justify a finding of probable cause at the time, (Minn.App.
State v. King 690 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. King 690 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Loeffler 626 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Secord 614 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Secord 614 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
at 2331 ; review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“The law of probable cause prevents the issuance of a search warrant on the basis of vague and uncertain information.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
*487 review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Zanter 518 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Zanter 518 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“[A] gap of two years from the source of the information to the application for a warrant is of great concern.” pet.
State v. Richardson 514 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1994