Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gales v. Gales, 553 N.W.2d 416.

23 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In Gales v. Gales, the supreme court reversed a permanent maintenance award that appeared to be based in part on the district court’ s finding that one spouse “suffered emotional distress since the time of the separation.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Fee awards under Minn. Stat. § 518.14 may be based on the impact a party’s behavior has had on the costs of the litigation regardless of the relative financial resources of the parties.” (citing Dabrowski for the proposition above).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Trung Thien Do, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
); (citing this aspect of Dabrowski).
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, e.g., Szarzynski v. Szarzynski , -96 (Minn. 27 App. 2007).3 Whether to award conduct-based atto rney fees generally depends on “the impact a party’s behavior has had on the costs of the litigation.” (citing this aspect of Dabrowski).
In re the Marriage of: Curtis Glenn Marks, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court “has broad discretion in deciding whether to award maintenance,” as well as in determining the amount and duration of any maintenance awarded
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2 (stating that maintenance is ordered without regard to marital misconduct); (“However painful it may be for the parties, marriage dissolution is not a tort for which a victim can be compensated; penalizing the ‘perpetrator’ through the pocketbook by awarding permanent maintenance would subvert the underlying policy of no-fault divorce enacted by the legislature of this st
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Gregory Olstad, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Gales v. Gales , , 418 (Minn. 1996) (contrasting “temporary rehabilitative maintenance” with permanent maintenance)
A17-1036 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(Minn. 12 Justin also contends that the district court made a clearly erroneous finding when it determined Rebecca was primarily a homemaker.
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
2 DECISION “The standard of review on appeal from a district court’s determination of a maintenance award is whether the district court abused its discretion.”
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(citing Dabrowski v. Dabrowski ).
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, -20 (Minn.1996); -18 (Wahl, J., dissenting).
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(refusing to award need-based attorney fees on appeal because party seeking fees did not provide court with current information on her income and expenses).
Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin 569 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1997
Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin 569 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1997
§ 518.552 we take this opportunity to address the question again in what might best be characterized as a unique factual and procedural context.
Marriage of Carrick v. Carrick 560 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Carrick v. Carrick 560 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The supreme court’s released after the trial court issued its decision in this case, does not weaken the importance of considering the role of the homemaker.