Cited by

1(c) (“Each statement of a material fact shall be accompanied by a reference to the record, as provided in Rule 128.03.”); (stating that a party’s failure “to provide citations to the record” is “a flagrant violation” of rule 128.02, subdivision 1(c), and can “lead to non-consideration of an issue”).

the record is extensive”) aff’d, d 364, 371-72 (Minn. App. 1998) (noting that failure to cite to the record can result in non- consideration of an issue).

Buscher v. Montag Dev., Inc., (applying the abuse-of-discretion standard to sanctions under rule 11.03); (applying the abuse- of-discretion standard to sanctions under Minn. Stat. § 549.211).

the record is extensive”) aff’d, -72 (Minn. App. 1998) (noting that failure to cite to the record can result in an argument not being properly before this court).

the record is extensive”), aff’d, -72 (Minn. App. 1998) (noting that failure to cite the record can result in an argument not being properly before this court).

(reasoning that state medical association had no reason to know that American Medical Association article it distributed contained false information); -69 (Minn. App. 1998) (determining 7 that St.

See, -90 (Minn. 1966) (civil-se rvice hearing reviewing city employee’s termination); 369 (Minn. App. 1998) (Board of Pardons hearing); 191-92 (Minn. App. 1997) (Department of Commerce bank-charter-application hearing), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.

Huntsman, No. A12 -2147 (Minn. App. Oct.

see Cole v. Star Tribune , , 368-69 (Minn. App. 1998) (holding that a newspaper that republished a story from a reputable wire service like the Associated Press has no duty to verify the accuracy of the AP wire report).

Failure to comply with the rules requiring citations to the record “can diminish a brief’s persuasiveness, lead to non-consideration of an issue, or dismissal of an appeal.” -72 (Minn. App. 1998) (citations omitted).

yelled for her father, who lived in the home with 1 Respondent requests that we strike the majority of appellant’s recitation of the facts because “appellant’s statement of the facts is almost completely unsupported by references to the record,” and Minn. R. Civ.

17, 1999); (striking portions of appellants’ briefs that “demonstrate^ either ignorance of, or willful disregard for, the appellate rules” when appellants’ facts sections contained no or few citations to the record and erroneously stated a fact that appellants later conceded to be incorrect).

Because the alleged violations of the rules do not suggest ignorance of or willful disregard for the rules, (awarding attorney fees where appellants did not have reasonable basis in law or fact to bring appeal and striking portions of appellants’ briefs for failing to provide citations, relying on extra-record assertions, and making repeated erroneous assertions of fact), or demonstrate use of the brief

The motion has also been granted where the brief does not conform to the rules of appellate procedure, -72 (Minn.App.1998), or where the “brief is used as a vehicle for disrespect, insult, and slanderous accusations.” State v. Gamelgard, 287 Minn. 74, 82