Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kelsey v. State, 214 N.W.2d 236.
-
State of Minnesota v. Paul James Steichen
Minn. 2026
The district court may not accept a typical guilty plea unless there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A proper factual basis requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
- State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
4 defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
Connor Jerome Eischens, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Accuracy requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A guilty plea is accurate when there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that [the] 10 defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A proper factual basis is established if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A guilty plea is accurate when there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A proper factual basis is established if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
For a plea to be accurate, a proper factual basis must be established on the record , meaning that the record must include facts “from which the defendant ’s guilt of the crime charged can be reasonably inferred.” (quotation omitted) ; (“[T]here must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant ’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A proper factual basis exists if there are “‘ sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” Iverson, d at 349 ().
-
Deshon Israel Bonnell,
Minn. 2022
The district court judge must ensure there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion tha t defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (stating that the district court judge “must make certain that facts exist from which the defendant’s guilt of the crime” to which he is pleading guilty can be reasonably inferred ).
-
Nicholas Patrick Pankuch, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A proper factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” (quoting Kelsey v. State , ).
-
Herald Edward Liu, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A proper factual basis exists if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
Malik Jordan Olsen, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A proper factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” ().
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A proper factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant ’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” Iverson, d at 349 (quoting Kelsey v. State , ).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A proper factual basis requires that there be “sufficient facts on the record to supp ort a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (“The factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty.” (quotation omitted)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nelson v. State , ; (explaining that a proper factual basis requires that there be “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty”).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A plea is not accurate, and the district court should not accept it, unless the record supports the “conclusion that [the] defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.”
-
Hunter Lee Briscoe, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
riscoe’s petition, the postconviction court relied on Gaulke v. State, 289 Minn. 354, 359, where the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a n issue of statutory right, as opposed to a n issue of constitutional right, “may be asserted only by a direct appeal rather than by a petition for postconviction relief.” The postconviction court also relied on Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 531, d 236, 237 (1974), in which the supreme court stated that issues that did not involve a factual dispute should ha
-
Michael Dejaris Denson, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532, (noting that first-degree murder defendant had admitted to fighting with the decedent, but “denied he had used a dangerous weapon or inflicted great bodily harm upon the victim” and “this was all that the trial court 1 Denson attempts
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An adequate factual basis exists where there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In general, a proper factual basis exists if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Iverson, d at 349 (quoting Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532, ).
- Mark Oran Schorn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Mark Oran Schorn v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A proper factual basis requires that there be “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- State of Minnesota v. Yusuf Ahmed Osman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Yusuf Ahmed Osman
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An adequate factual basis exists where there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Accuracy requires that the plea be supported by a proper factual basis, that there “must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson
867 N.W.2d 210
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” Iverson, d at 349 (quoting Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532, ).
- State of Minnesota v. Leroy Hamer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Hamer, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A proper factual basis requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A proper factual basis requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
-
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota
853 N.W.2d 149
Minn. 2014
When determining whether a guilty plea has an adequate factual basis, we examine whether there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532, (emphasis added).
- State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, a factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” Iverson, d at 349 (quoting Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532, ).
- Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
-
Lussier v. State
821 N.W.2d 581
Minn. 2012
See Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532 , (per curiam) (“[T]here must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (emphasis added)).
- State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
State v. Petersen
799 N.W.2d 653
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
- Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
-
Holt v. State
772 N.W.2d 470
Minn. 2009
A defendant’s absence “is not ground for a new trial if he was not prejudiced,” McGath, d at 886 (citing Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532 , ), and such an absence will be reviewed for harmless error.