Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wright, 679 N.W.2d 186.

44 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 186, 190 (Minn. App. 2004), rev. denied (Minn. Jun.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
If corroboration is necessary, testimony about the victim’s demeanor, emotional condition, and change in behavior after the sexual assault “is strong corroborative evidence.” , rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004); see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that testimony about a victim’s “demeanor, emotional condition, and change in behavior after the sexual assault .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(concluding that testimony from others about a victim’s emotional state after an alleged sexual assault corroborated the victim’s claim that she had been assaulted), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, (noting that we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the conviction,” and limit our r eview “to a careful analysis of the evidence to determine whether the jury .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A guilty verdict may be based on the testimony of a single credible witness, because 9 “[c]orroboration is not required in criminal sexual conduct cases,” rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[T]he jury is free to accept some aspects of a witness’s testimony and reject others.” rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, (“The testimony from others about K.R.’s demeanor, emotional condition, and change in behavior after the sexual assault also is strong corroborative evidence.”), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004) ; (“Furthermore, N.D.’s upset, emotional st
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And “[c]orroboration is not required in criminal sexual conduct cases.” rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
directly in [cousin’s] face.” Cousin believed the victim was acting “weird,” “was acting 5 different than her normal self,” and appeared “nervous.” Cousin testified that the victim later told her that Rodri guez raped her, and she appeared to be “in shock.” “Corroboration is not required in criminal sexual conduct cases.” rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004) .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
the testimony of a victim need not be corroborated.”); (“Corroboration is not required in criminal sexual conduct cases.”), review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
By stipulating to an element of an offense, a defendant “waives the right to a jury trial on that element and removes unduly prejudicial evidence from the jury’s consideration.” State v. Wright , review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Wright , review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Wright , review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Wright , review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018), and J.R.’s testimony was corroborated by her own consistent, detailed description of Rawson’s conduct and by the testimony of others about her emotional state, (stating that prior consistent statements, the level of detail in testimony, and testimony of others about a victim’s “emotional condition” may be corroborative evidence), review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Wright , review denied (Minn. Jun.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Corroborative evidence includes testimony from others regarding the victim’s “demeanor, emotional condition, and change[s] in behavior after [a] sexual assault.” review denied 8 (Minn. June 29, 2004).
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
By stipulating to an element of an offense, a defendant “waives the right to a jury trial on that element and removes unduly prejudicial evidence from the jury’s consideration.” State v. 8 Wright, review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. 10 Wright, review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Richard Blegen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Brandon Richard Blegen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Lamar James Crump Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lamar James Crump Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3(a); review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“A defendant’s right to a jury trial includes the right to be tried on each and every element of the charged offense.” review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
26, 2005); (stipulating to element of age), review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004).
State v. Hinton 702 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Hinton 702 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. June 24, 2004)
State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
at 159 ( review denied (Minn. June 29, 2004)).
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
rev iew denied (Minn. June 29, 2004), this court held that a defendant’s stipulation to an element of an offense must be supported by a personal oral or written waiver of the defendant’s right to a jury trial on that element.