Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kush v. Mathison, 683 N.W.2d 841.

187 citing documents.

John Patrick Becker v. Pablo Murillo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Two or more instances of harassing con duct constitute “repeated incidents.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Caleb Samuel Pesola v. Joel Patrick Jahraus Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Katherine Corrine McClain v. Troy Dennis Midas Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Elsayed M. Elsaid Mahmoud v. Abdi Salad Roble Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An appellate court will not set aside a district court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but this court will “reverse the issuance of a restraining order if it is not supported by sufficient evidence.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Caitlyn Elizabeth Stenerson v. Kevin Michael Stanton Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Linde Sayen v. Michael Sayen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Staples-Motley School District (A19-0466), Paul David Anderson (A19-0468) v. Dave Johnson, a/k/a David Kenneth Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- 44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jenna Marie Bjerke v. Dan Naweto Flomo Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court ’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Aaron Olson v. Cortney Nichole Mathis Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gabrielle Marie Geraci v. Jack Cyril Maxwell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Emily Peterson v. Scott Howard Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jason McKenzie v. Aaron Louis Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An appellate court reviews a district court’s grant of a harassment restraining order under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” 3 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Ripley Karen Bresson v. Jason James Ourada Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Peterson v. Johnson , Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Heather Marie Romanowicz v. Steven Penttila Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Rebecca Anderson v. Benjamin Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The district court’s findings of fact “will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” 843-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Carly Jaye Nelson v. Oscar Ivan Garcia Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N “An appellate court reviews a district court’s grant of a[n] [ HRO] under an abuse- of-discretion standard.” Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Tara Ann Nesmoe-Thompson v. Neil V. Lindemann, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jacqueline Marie Thibodeaux v. Charles Matthew Waters Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court ’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Tracy Leigh Thompson o/b/o D. X. T v. David Winfred Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
P. 52.01; -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Shawdy Kiani v. John Huha Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[W]hether certain conduct constitutes harassment may be judged from both an objective standard, when assessing the effect the conduct has on the typical victim, and a subjective standard, to the extent the court may determine the harasser’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Angela Mary Frame v. Joseph Battles Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kush v. Mathison , , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Mark Monacelli v. Stanley R. Henricksen Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Randall Tague and obo Minor v. Bernard Menge Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district co urt’s findings of fact “will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Se pt.
Dean Murray v. Casondra Schaffer, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Florkime Sannie-joy Paye v. Abdullah Kiatamba Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But we “will reverse the issuance of a restraining order if it is not supported by sufficient evidence.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of: Joanne Lynn Kargel Lund v. Michael Alan Lund Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , 43-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Joseph Charles Adler v. Jennifer Lynn Adler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Pakou Lee-Barrios and o/b/o Minor Child v. Eric Joseph Vacko Below, Brittany Ann Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
James Michael Olsen, Krisann Jeanne Olsen v. James Robert Greger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court applies a clear-error standard of review to a district court’s findings of fact concerning a petitioner’s allegations of harassment, -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Neegonee Brunner v. Leigh Anna Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2017
P. 52.01; -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Tami Juberian obo Minor Children (A16-2061), Tami Juberian (A16-2062) v. Nancy Hail Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sarah Yule v. Jan Kehlenbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sarah B. Janecek v. Lee Aaron Rosenthal Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Paula Polinsky v. Charles M. Bolton Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler v. Mark Joseph McDonough Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N “[T]he harassment laws place carefully limited restraints on individuals whose conduct goes beyond an acceptable expression of outrage and civilized conduct, and instead causes a substantial adverse effect on another ’s safety, security or privacy.” , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gemma Watson v. Jeremiah Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 D E C I S I O N We review the district court’s decision to issue an HRO for an abuse of discretion and “will reverse the issuance of a restraining order if it is not supported by sufficient evidence.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 “A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-46 (Minn. App. 2004) (reviewing HRO granted after contested hearing); (same).
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” d 841, 843-44 (Minn. App. 2004) (citing Minn. R. Civ.
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children, vs. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children, vs. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
–44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Nathan Gregor, et al v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharper Management, LLC, et al v. Melvin Pittel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nathan Gregor, et al v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by