Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kush v. Mathison, 683 N.W.2d 841.

183 citing documents.

Caitlyn Elizabeth Stenerson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Linde Sayen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
A19-0468 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- 44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jenna Marie Bjerke, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court ’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
, A18-1155 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gabrielle Marie Geraci, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Emily Peterson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jason McKenzie, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An appellate court reviews a district court’s grant of a harassment restraining order under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” 3 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Ripley Karen Bresson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Peterson v. Johnson , Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Heather Marie Romanowicz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Rebecca Anderson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The district court’s findings of fact “will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” 843-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Carly Jaye Nelson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N “An appellate court reviews a district court’s grant of a[n] [ HRO] under an abuse- of-discretion standard.” Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Tara Ann Nesmoe-Thompson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jacqueline Marie Thibodeaux, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court ’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Tracy Leigh Thompson o/b/o D. X. T., petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
P. 52.01; -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Shawdy Kiani, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[W]hether certain conduct constitutes harassment may be judged from both an objective standard, when assessing the effect the conduct has on the typical victim, and a subjective standard, to the extent the court may determine the harasser’s intent.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
Angela Mary Frame, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kush v. Mathison , , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Mark Monacelli, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Randall Tague and obo Minor, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district co urt’s findings of fact “will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Se pt.
Dean Murray, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Florkime Sannie-joy Paye, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But we “will reverse the issuance of a restraining order if it is not supported by sufficient evidence.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of: Joanne Lynn Kargel Lund, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , 43-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Pakou Lee-Barrios and o/b/o Minor Child, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Joseph Charles Adler, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
James Michael Olsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court applies a clear-error standard of review to a district court’s findings of fact concerning a petitioner’s allegations of harassment, -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Neegonee Brunner, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
P. 52.01; -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A16-2062 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sarah Yule, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sarah B. Janecek, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kush v. Mathison , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Paula Polinsky, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N “[T]he harassment laws place carefully limited restraints on individuals whose conduct goes beyond an acceptable expression of outrage and civilized conduct, and instead causes a substantial adverse effect on another ’s safety, security or privacy.” , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gemma Watson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 D E C I S I O N We review the district court’s decision to issue an HRO for an abuse of discretion and “will reverse the issuance of a restraining order if it is not supported by sufficient evidence.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 “A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” -44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-46 (Minn. App. 2004) (reviewing HRO granted after contested hearing); (same).
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses.” d 841, 843-44 (Minn. App. 2004) (citing Minn. R. Civ.
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children v. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children v. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
–44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Nathan Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharper Management, LLC v. Melvin Pittel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nathan Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sharper Management, LLC v. Melvin Pittel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-44 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Rebecca Lee Treptow v. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by