Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Marriage of Dahl v. Dahl, 765 N.W.2d 118.

121 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Awal Ismael Hussein, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that court must “demonstrate an awareness and application of the 25% presumption when the issue is appropriately raised and the court awards less than 25% parenting time”).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Edwards, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Dodamwalage Dinesh Jayawardena, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Custody of: B. L. F. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We review a district court’s parenting-time decision for abuse of discretion, affirming the court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
In re the Marriage of: David Michael Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Dahl v. Dahl
In re the Marriage of: Sheree Rosett Curry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dahl v. Dahl , (citation omitte d).
In re the Matter of: Robert Burdette, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. D.-P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul Thomas Hesse, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Linde Anne Sayen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Custody of J. M. H. and A. M. H. Roland John Hillstrom, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Gordon Burnett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
at 217 ( , 124 (Minn. App. 2009)).
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Because appellate courts recognize that a district court has broad discretion to decide ques tions of parenting time, Olson v. Olson , appellate courts will not reverse a parenting-time decision unless the district court abused its discretion by misapplying the law or by making findings unsupported by the record
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Modifications [of parenting time] are less substantial changes in parenting time.” Dahl v. Dahl , (quotation omitted).
In re the Matter of: Sedina Glover, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Christensen v. Healey 899 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
ANALYSIS “The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (Minn.App.
In re the Marriage of: Molly Kathryn Sanders, joint-petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Rebekah L. Bennett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A district court’s findings of fact underlying a parenting-time decision will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Sheree Rosett Curry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The district court has broad discretion to determine “parenting - time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Matter of: J. S. S., petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The district court has broad discretion in determ ining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer 891 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer 891 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
County of Washington, Danielle Kathryn Richardson v. Brandon Christopher Fischer Minn. Ct. App. 2017
County of Washington, Danielle Kathryn Richardson v. Brandon Christopher Fischer Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kylie Jo McCuen v. Joshua William McCuen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kylie Jo McCuen v. Joshua William McCuen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” d 118, 123 (Minn. App. 2009).
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson v. Steven Gary Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson v. Steven Gary Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
5(b) (2014); –24 (Minn. App. 2009) (stating that “[a] restriction occurs when a change to parenting time is substantial” and that “[m]odifications are less substantial changes in parenting time” (quotations omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A “district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini v. Brent John Constantini Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini v. Brent John Constantini Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“To determine whether a reduction in parenting time constitutes a restriction or modification, the court should consider the reasons for the change as well as the amount of the reduction.”
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Chetly Ramsammy v. Ashley Marie Ramsammy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Chetly Ramsammy v. Ashley Marie Ramsammy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5(a) “Determining the legal standard applicable to a change in parenting time is a question of law and is subject to de novo review.”
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court’s findings of fact underlying a parenting- 15 time decision will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Christine Lynn Sypnieski, f/k/a Christine Lynn Holtz v. Kevin Douglas Holtz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christine Lynn Sypnieski, f/k/a Christine Lynn Holtz v. Kevin Douglas Holtz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court’s findings of fact underlying a parenting-time decision will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” ().
In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2015