Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711.

61 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
We have explained that, “in marital cases, it is especially important that the basis for the court’s decision be set forth with a high degree of particularity if appellate court review is to be meaningful.” (quotations omitted), rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
for an abuse of discretion.” (citing Hecker v. Hecker , ).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A voluntary change in circumstances will not generally result in a modification of a maintenance obligation if the change was made in bad faith and was “primarily influenced by a specific intent to decrease or terminate maintenance.” (quotation omitted), rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , pet.
Sandra May Schumann, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion 8 when it makes findings unsupported by the ev idence or when it im properly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(permitting consideration of a party’s motives in voluntarily creating a change of circumstances).
In re the Marriage of: Jonathon Henry Ortner, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , (quotation omitted), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Erika Lynn Huerta, nka Erika Lynn Mazzitello, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
8 -20 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But appellate review is possible only when the district court makes findings that are sufficiently detailed to show its consideration of “all factors relevant to an award.” (“ Effective appellate review of an award of maintenance is possible only when the [district] court has issued sufficiently detailed 1 We note that “permanent maintenance” is a “term of art,” and does not refer to the duration of the maintenance
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-20 (Minn. App. 2009) , review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or wh en it improperly applies the law.” 6 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , (addressing the intersection of retirement and modification of maintenance), review granted (Minn. Sept.
A17-1036 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Ann Gronvall, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Where an obligor voluntarily creates a change of circumstances, the trial court should consider the obligor’s motives.” 717 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jason John Helms, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , -17 (Minn. App. 2009).
In re the Marriage of: Michele Lura Honderich-Flannery, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by t he evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , (quotation omitted), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of th e evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen , (quotation omitted), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Cassie Marie Birr, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted) .
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the change was made in good faith, then the obligee should share in the hardship as if the parties had remained together.” review 6 granted (Minn. Sep.
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Remand for additional findings is appropriate when the district court fails to make adequate findings.” 720 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Hutchenson Owen v. Angela Dawn Owen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Hutchenson Owen v. Angela Dawn Owen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Remand for additional findings is appropriate when the district court fails to make adequate findings.” review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ellen O�Mara-Meyer v. William Philip Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ellen O�Mara-Meyer v. William Philip Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Effective appellate review of an award of maintenance is possible only when the [district] court has issued sufficiently detailed findings of fact to demonstrate its consideration of all factors relevant to an award.” (quotation omitted), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: William David Wilder v. Michelle R. Wilder Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: William David Wilder v. Michelle R. Wilder Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“We conclude that the findings about appellant’s means to pay the attorney fees are inadequate because we cannot determine how the district court assessed appellant’s means.
Heidi Jo Olson v. Mark Douglas Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Heidi Jo Olson v. Mark Douglas Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
when it improperly applies the law.” review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015