Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Department, 783 N.W.2d 182.

64 citing documents.

In re the Final NPDES/SDS Permit for 3M Cottage Grove Center. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Complaint of Troy Scheffler Regarding Representative Joshua Heintzeman and the Committee to Elect … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
8 reached improperly.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Tanya Hipkins, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
10 We defer to the agency’s determinations “regarding conflicts in testimony, the weight given to expert testimony, and the inferences to be drawn from testimony.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Appeal by Souriyathay Adult Daycare Order of License Revocation License No.: 1108140 (Adult … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A decision is supported by substantial evidence when it is supported by “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Complaint of Troy Scheffler Regarding Representative Joshua Heintzeman and the Committee to Elect … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Complaint of Troy Scheffler Regarding Representative Joshua Heintzeman and the Committee to Elect … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
And the party challenging that determination bears the burden of proving that the decision “was reached improperly.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
City of Brooklyn Park, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Nicole Blissenbach, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 Minnesota caselaw has defined substantial evidence as: “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, d 182, 189 (Minn. App. 2010) (quotation omitted).
Dan Murphy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The rules governing statutory interpretation are applicable to the interpretation of city ordinances.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, -93 (Minn. App. 2010).
Christopher Humphrey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Substantial evidence is “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quoting Minn. Ctr.
City of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[W]hen construing an ordinance, we first determine whether the language is reasonably subject to more than one interpretation.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t
In the Matter of the Peace Officer License of Thomas Andrew Winsell, License No. 18612. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Substantial evidence is that which “a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, d 182, 189 (Minn. App. 2010) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Minnesota Racing Commission’s Approval of Running Aces Casino, Hotel & Racetrack’s Request to … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Substantial evidence is: “ (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Hiebert Greenhouses of Minnesota, Inc., et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The party challenging the decision bears the burden of proving that it “was reached improperly.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Mohamed Shaaban Sultan, Relator v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Chad Thompson v. the Commissioner of Douglas County Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Chad Thompson v. the Commissioner of Douglas County Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The party challenging an agency decision bears the burden of proving that the decision “was reached improperly.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Mohamed Shaaban Sultan, Relator v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, d 182, 192-93 (Minn. App. 2010).
In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“If [the commissioner] engage[d] in reasoned decisionmaking, the court will affirm, even though it may have reached a different conclusion had it been the factfinder.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quoting Cable Commc’ns Bd.
In the Matter of the Appeal by Serenity Adult Day Center of the Order of License Revocation License … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Appeal by Serenity Adult Day Center of the Order of License Revocation License … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Substantial evidence is defined as: “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence 6 considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In re the Matter of Ossawinnamakee Road Homeowners v. Commissioner of City of Breezy Point, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of Ossawinnamakee Road Homeowners v. Commissioner of City of Breezy Point, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Medical License of Christopher John Kovanda, M.D. License No. 41657. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Substantial evidence is “defined as: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’ t, (q uotation omitted).
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a c onclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Del Zotto Products. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Nor-west Cable Commc’ns P’ship, -69 (Minn. 1984); Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (stating that the substantial-evidence standard addresses the reasonableness of what the agency did on the basis of the evidence before it).
In the Matter of the Decision on the Petition Requesting the Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” -17 (Minn. App. 2020) (quoting Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, ), rev. denied (Minn. June 30, 2020).
In re the Matter of: Talea Glesener, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evidence as a 10 reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep ’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of Walter Smith’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, d 182, 189 (Minn. App. 2010) (quotation omitted).
Asha Ahmed, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We defer to the agency’s determinations “regarding conflicts in testimony, the weight given to expert testimony, and the inferences to be drawn from 14 testimony.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Billie Edmonds, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t
Johnsonville, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 City of Minneapolis , (applying de novo review to a challenge to the constitutionality of an ordinance); Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , (applying de novo review to a question involving the interpretation and application of a city ordinance ).
In the Matter of the Licensing Order Issued to Gaffney Construction LLC, and Steven Gaffney, Individually. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In re: Demolition of First Church of Christ Scientist, 614 15th Street East (PLAN10644). Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Decisions of 5 administrative bodies are reviewed for “substantial evidence” which is defined as “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In re: A resolution of the North Mankato City Council in the matter of a nuisance property located … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul, Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, -93 (Minn. A pp. 2010) (providing that rules of statutory interpretation also apply to interpretation of ordinances).
Peter Stalland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , -93 (Minn. App. 2010).
In the Matter of Reba Mitchell’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evid ence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
Richard T. Jellinger, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dept. , .
In the Matter of the Administrative Order Issued to Moses Wazwaz, Individually, Allstate Construction, Inc., and A & … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Substantial evidence is defined as (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , (quotation omitted).
ITW Food Equipment Group LLC, a/k/a Hobart, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
11 relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evid ence; (3) more than some evide nce; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Appeal of the Denial of Renewal of Therapeutic Massage License Numbers EMT-13217 and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2008)).
Gregory Mailand, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) such relevant evid ence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla 5 of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; or (5) the evidence considered in its entirety.” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t , (quotation omitted) .
County of Isanti, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
” Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’ t, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Civil Penalty Issued to: Patrick Takuanyi Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t
In the Matter of 2015 Class C License Application of Dr. Mohamed El Deeb. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of 2015 Class C License Application of Dr. Mohamed El Deeb. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t, (stating that “[w]e defer to [the factfinder’s] conclusions regarding conflicts in testimony .
County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cannon v. Minneapolis Police Dep’t