Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of North Oaks v. Sarpal, 797 N.W.2d 18.

139 citing documents.

In re the Estate of Oria Albert Brinkmeier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Estate of Oria Albert Brinkmeier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Electrical Contractor License of Three Stone Paths LLC, f/k/a B&T Technical Services, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A party seeking to equitably estop a governmental entity must prove, among other things, “wrongful conduct on the part of an authorized government agent.” (quotation omitted).
Joy Litke, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, - 24 (Minn. 2011) (reviewing district court’s equitable-estoppel decision after bench trial for an abuse of discretion); Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc., (reviewing district court’s equitable-subrogation decision for an abuse of discretion); Nadeau v. County
In re the Estate of Trisha J Ingersoll a/k/a Trisha Jolee Ingersoll, Trisha Ingersoll f/k/a Trisha Offerman, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
First and Third Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
.” 16 view of the law” or is “against the facts in the record.”
M. Elizabeth Benedict, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review a district court’s “equitable determinations for abuse of discretion.”
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kelly Michels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[A] district court’s conclusion on equitable estoppel after a bench trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
Spring Grove Township, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Northern Lines Contracting, Inc., Appellant, vs. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: New American Development Center Appeal of MDE-NPS January through April 2022 Claims Disallowance Decision in the … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-24 (Minn. 2011) (quotation omitted) .
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 18, 23-24 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Joseph Kurian, individually, and as Trustee for Samael Alessandro Ittyerah, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Michael Bartell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A21-1320 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Aspenwood Condominium of Duluth, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Croix Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 18, 22, 25-26 (Minn. 2011); Mohler v. City of St.
Town of Denmark, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See City of North Oaks v. Sarpal
Everest Stables, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Otto Bremer Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Generally, a district court abuses its di scretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law, Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc., or when its decision is against the facts in the record
Whitefish Enterprises, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Peter Stalland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
25- 26 (Minn. 2011); Mohler v. City of St.
Jodi D. Campbell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court abuses its discretion when its “ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law” or when “its decision is against the fact s in the record.” City of N. Oaks v. Sarpal
In the Matter of the MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Retirement Benefit of Pamela S. Johnson. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal , (reversing the determination that the elements of estoppel had been met and concluding that the conduct in question was not wrongful but rather a simple mistake).
In re the Estate of: Shirley Joy Pratt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. 2020
“Under an abuse-of-discretion standard, we may overrule the district court when the court’s ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law.” City of N. Oaks v. Sarpal
David Timp, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-1585 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(concluding that it is immaterial whether the fact -finder is a judge or jury in this context ), rev’d on other grounds
Carol Eppolite, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A party seeking to invoke equitable estoppel against a governmental entity must establish four elements: (1) “wrongful conduct” by an authorized government agent, (2) reasonable reliance on the wrongful conduct, (3) “a unique expenditure in reliance on the wrongful conduct,” and (4) equit able considerations that “weigh in favor of estoppel.” City of North Oaks v. Sarpal , (citations omitted).
Brian J. Henel, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal
Shannon Miller, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kathy Roe, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thibodeaux v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thibodeaux v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal , , 25 (Minn. 2011).
SM Investments, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
This court reviews “equitable determinations for an abuse of discretion.” City of N. Oaks v. Sarpal
Production Stamping, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court abuses its discretion if its ruling is “based on an erroneous view of the law” or is “a gainst the facts in the record.”
James C. Holmes, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
City of N. Oaks v. Sarpal
Criticized , A17-1345 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of: Helen Vikla, Conservatee. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Melrose Gates, see also City of North Oaks v. Sarpal , (c oncluding that “a district court’s conclusion on equitable estoppel .
David L. Phillips, Jr., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Appellate courts review “equitable determinations for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Ann Gronvall, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vene Lor, as conservator and natural mother of Ricky Yang, and Vene Lor, individually, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Under the abuse -of-discretion standard, we ma y overrule the district court when the court’s ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law.” City of N. Oaks v. Sarpal , 4 (Minn. 2011).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lapoint v. Orthodontics 892 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 2017