Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Foster v. Foster, 802 N.W.2d 755.

24 citing documents.

Nogodjouan Diomande, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We review a district court’s grant of a request to change a child’s name for [an] abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A district court abuses its discretion when evidence in the record does not support the factual findings, the court misapplied the law, or the court settles a dispute in a way that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
David Kaslow Swan v. Heidi Bloedel Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2023
David Kaslow Swan v. Heidi Bloedel Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court abuses its discretion when evidence in the record does not support the factual findings, the court misapplied the law, or the court’s decision “is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Application of Luvenia Kollman for a Change of Name On Behalf of a … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
3 “We review a district court’s grant of a request to change a child’s name for [an] abuse of discretion.”
In the Matter of: S. A. A., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review a district court’s grant of a request to change a child’s name for [an] abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretio n when evidence in the record does not support the factual findings, the court misapplied the 5 law, or the co urt settles a dispute in a way that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Foster v. Foster , (“[W]e are not permitted to reweigh the evidence when reviewing a district court’s decision 17 to determine whether the court abused its discretion.”); (“That the record might support findings other than those made by the trial
In the Matter of the Application of Debora Lee Neu, Brian Joseph Neu for a Change of Name … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion when evidence in the record does not support the factual findings, the court misapplied the law, or the court settles a dispute in a way that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Application of: Hollis John Larson for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if its findings of fact are unsupported by the record, if it improperly applies the law, or if it resolves the matter in a way that is “against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In the Marriage of: Debra Lynn Ober, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if the division is “against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Application of Russell Vincent Winbush for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if its findings of fact are unsupported by the record, if it improperly applies the law, or if it resolves the matter in a way that is “against logic and 3 the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Molly Kathryn Sanders, joint-petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 755, 759 (Minn. App. 2011) (“[W]e are not permitted to reweigh the evidence when reviewing a district court’s decision to determine whether the court abused its discretion.”).
Larson Ventures, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that an appellate court defers to the district court’s credibility determinations ); Foster v. Foster , (“[W]e are not permitted to reweigh the evidence when reviewing a district court’s decision to determine whether the court abused its discretion.”).
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court abuses its discretion when evidence in the record does not support the factual findings, the court misapplied the law, or the court settles a dispute in a way that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted); see also Pikula, d at 710.
In re the Matter of: Application of Laura Beth Long for a Change of Name on behalf of … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Application of Laura Beth Long for a Change of Name on behalf of … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “We review a district court’s grant of a request to change a child’s name for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 811 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 811 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(recognizing that a district court abuses its discretion when it misapplies the law).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by