Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik, Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik, 850 N.W.2d 732.

37 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” see also Minn. Stat. §§ 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Sneha Singh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Ann Jones Chidothe, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Scott Michael Gold, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re the Marriage of: Allison Catherine Buckner, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“When an attorney -fee award turns on the construction and application of a statute, it presents a question of law, which is reviewed de novo.”
Mower County Health and Human Services, Petitioner, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sanvick v. Sanvick , (citing In re Estate of Holmberg
In re the Marriage of: Helena Koivu, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion by misapplying the law.”
In re the Marriage of: John Edward Warrington, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A condu ct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
A20-0501 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether res judicata is available in a 9 particular case is a question reviewed de novo.” 5
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion by misapplying the law.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. T. and T. Z., Sr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether res judicata is available in a particular case is a question reviewed de novo.” Sanvik v. Sanvi k
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: V. N. M. and C. W. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Sonja Vogen Baertsch, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Baertsch v. Baertsch 886 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marriage of Baertsch v. Baertsch 886 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If the language of a statute is unambiguous on its face, “our role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The attorney lien on a client’s cause of action “prevent[s] a client from benefiting from an attorney’s services without paying for them and provides security for recovery of fees.” see Barnes v. Verry, 154 Minn. 252, 255, 191 N.W.