DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik, 850 N.W.2d 732.

39 citing documents.

In Re. the Marriage of: Michelle Dorothea McKenna-Koziura v. Amy Nicole Koziura Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Julie Karen Johnson v. Thomas Francis Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of Joshua Laurance Patterson v. Rebecca Marie Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” see also Minn. Stat. §§ 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: John A Laumann v. Kelly M Laumann Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: John Andrew Sinnott v. Kelli Anne Sinnott, n/k/a Kelli Anne Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Allison Baron Bonnett v. Theodore James Bonnett Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Sydney Reed Lesch v. John Patrick Lesch Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward Nordahl Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Marilena Elizabeth Hyman v. Sean Michael Hyman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peter Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Sneha Singh v. Ashok Kumar Goyal Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Ann Jones Chidothe v. Edward Chidothe Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Scott Michael Gold v. Chelsey Dodge Frawley Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re the Marriage of: Allison Catherine Buckner v. Bernard Joseph Robichaud, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Mark David Plucinski v. Ellen Marie Budzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke v. Susan Lynn Webb Leeke, n/k/a Susan Lynn Leeke Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“When an attorney -fee award turns on the construction and application of a statute, it presents a question of law, which is reviewed de novo.”
Mower County Health and Human Services, April Ann Rowe v. Michael Paul Osborn Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sanvick v. Sanvick , (citing In re Estate of Holmberg
In re the Marriage of: Helena Koivu v. Mikko Sakari Koivu Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion by misapplying the law.”
In re the Marriage of: John Edward Warrington v. Karen Lee Warrington Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A condu ct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. J. K. and J. W. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether res judicata is available in a 9 particular case is a question reviewed de novo.” 5
In the Matter of: Kathryn Marie Larson, on behalf of Minor Child v. Keith Norman Marohn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion by misapplying the law.”
In re the Marriage of: John Edward Warrington, and Karen Lee Warrington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. T. and T. Z., Sr., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether res judicata is available in a particular case is a question reviewed de novo.” Sanvik v. Sanvi k
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: V. N. M. and C. W. N., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger v. Richard C. Dreger Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Sonja Vogen Baertsch v. Andrew Baertsch Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: David Allan Kotz v. Edna Vassilovski Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A conduct-based attorney-fee award is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, County of Itasca, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve v. Chantal T. Shreve Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Baertsch v. Baertsch 886 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marriage of Baertsch v. Baertsch 886 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Brian Matthew Hood v. Katherine June Downing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If the language of a statute is unambiguous on its face, “our role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (quotation omitted).
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The attorney lien on a client’s cause of action “prevent[s] a client from benefiting from an attorney’s services without paying for them and provides security for recovery of fees.” see Barnes v. Verry, 154 Minn. 252, 255, 191 N.W.