Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Lemaine Barker, 888 N.W.2d 348.

87 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Lex Phaengdara Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Archie Grenier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Kingbird Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Actual possession involves “direct physical control.” (quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Gunnar Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Nyapuot Dech Kuek Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Edward Alexander Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Nicolle Renee Berg Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Actual possession means “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Kacey Emmanuel Kamara Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Edward Walker McDowell Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. John Demarco Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Circumstantial evidence is defined as evidence based on inference and not on personal knowledge or observation and all evidence that is not given by eyewitness testimony.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Zachary Lee Frye Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Andre Antonio Walker Hansbrough Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. James Edward Jones, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Scott Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Scott Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Ray Apel Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (), aff’d
Mohamed Shaaban Sultan v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Mohamed Shaaban Sultan v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Shane Ryan Oneil Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Shane Ryan Oneil Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.
State of Minnesota v. Erick Martinez-Mondragon Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Erick Martinez-Mondragon Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Jacoby Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The mere fact that an item is not in a defendant’s physical possession at the time of apprehension does not preclude prosecution for actual possession.”
State of Minnesota v. James Dean Olson, II Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Marc Richard Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(defining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Edbin Jose Coreas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Thomas Ortley Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Dak Luk Ret Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 348, 353 (Minn. App. 2016) (defining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object (quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.
State of Minnesota v. Matthew James Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Lynden Stone Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Richard Alan Quarles Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(Minn. 2 The district court also imposed a concurrent sentence of 21 months for the third- degree drug offense that is not at issue in this appeal.
State of Minnesota v. Bounkieng Sinthavong Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Pedro Ricardo Flores Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The district court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state and may not assess the relative credibility or weight of conflicting evidence.” (citation and quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, vs Tyrone Demetrius Boswell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Scott Bailey Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-54 (Minn. App. 2016) (explaining that constructive possession may be established “by proof of a strong probability that the defendant was at the time consciously exercising dominion and control over [the relevant item], even if the item was in a place to which others had access” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Wayne Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Physical possession involves “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Freddie Tyrone Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 348, 353 (Minn. App. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abdirahman Jama Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Physical possession involves “direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Terrvante Rennicko Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Actual possession involves “direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. James Edward Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(def ining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lamar Mutcherson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Wayland Deshawn Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Actual possession is “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Cortez Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Allen Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Actual possession is defined as “direct physical co ntrol.” (quotation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Mar.