Cited by

Actual possession involves “direct physical control.” (quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.

Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).

Actual possession means “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

“Circumstantial evidence is defined as evidence based on inference and not on personal knowledge or observation and all evidence that is not given by eyewitness testimony.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2016) (quotation omitted).

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (), aff’d

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (), aff’d

(quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.

“The mere fact that an item is not in a defendant’s physical possession at the time of apprehension does not preclude prosecution for actual possession.”

(defining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object (quotation omitted)).

Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

d 348, 353 (Minn. App. 2016) (defining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object (quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.

(quoting Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

(Minn. 2 The district court also imposed a concurrent sentence of 21 months for the third- degree drug offense that is not at issue in this appeal.

“The district court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state and may not assess the relative credibility or weight of conflicting evidence.” (citation and quotation omitted).

Actual possession “involves direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).

-54 (Minn. App. 2016) (explaining that constructive possession may be established “by proof of a strong probability that the defendant was at the time consciously exercising dominion and control over [the relevant item], even if the item was in a place to which others had access” (quotation omitted)).

Physical possession involves “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

d 348, 353 (Minn. App. 2016) (quotation omitted).

Physical possession involves “direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).

Actual possession involves “direct physical control.” State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).

(def ining actual possession as the exercise of “direct physical control” over an object).

State v. Barker , (quotation omitted).

Actual possession is “direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

Actual possession is defined as “direct physical co ntrol.” (quotation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Mar.

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).

“Actual possession, also referred to as physical possession, involves direct physical control.” (quotation omitted).