Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Williams v. State, 910 N.W.2d 736.

72 citing documents.

John Kevin Melina, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant bears the burden of proof to demonstrate that a sentence was unlawful under rule 27.03.” d 828, 835 (Minn. App. 2025) (–43 (Minn. 2018)), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(emphasis omitted).2 “‘The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal- history score.’” Pruitt, d at 860 ().
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 736, 740 (Minn. 2018).1 When multiple sentences are imposed based on a single course of conduct, a district court must include only the weight from the most severe offense when calculating a defendant’s criminal-history score.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
Simon Christopher Mueller, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DeMarcus LeMaine Barker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
9, to correct a sentence after the time for direct appeal has passed, the defendant bears the burden of proving that his or her sentence was based on an incorrect criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.” d 736, 740 (Minn. 2018) .
Bruce Ray Fairbanks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The burden is on the state to “show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
In the Matter of: Serina Anne Aubrecht, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Paul Casey Mason, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The state bears the burden to “show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal -history score.” .
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lee Jensrud Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lee Jensrud Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Loren Clyde Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Loren Clyde Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0163 Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0163 Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
5 We observe that the moving party has the burden of proof on rule 27.03 motions, and on postconviction petitions under section 590.01
Danny Hamilton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Joshua Stuart Vossen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lannon Lavar Burdunice, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The state bears the burden to “show that a prior conviction qualifie s for inclusion within the criminal history score.”
Robert Earl Leatherberry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-43 (Minn. 2018); see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04, subd.
Joshua Raymond Armendariz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Eric John Henderson-Bey, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Marlow Shelton McDonald, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Eugene Francis Cuypers, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. 2021
at 142; (“When a Minnesota rule is modeled after a federal rule, federal cases are instructive in the interpretation of the corresponding Minnesota rule.”).
Kevin Terrance Hannon, Minn. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 736, 740 (Minn. 2018) (stating, in context of out-of-state offense classification, “[t]he State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score”).
Victor Demetrius Cole, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The state bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The state bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal - history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The state bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal -history score.”
Raymond Cortez Steward, Minn. 2020
David Laurence Hodges, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] sentence based on an incorrect criminal-history score falls within the scope of the rule because such a sentence is one that is not authorized by law.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The state bears the burden to “show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclus ion within the criminal-history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior convictio n qualifies for inclusion within the criminal -history score.” d 736, 740 (Minn. 2018).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The state bears the burden to “show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal- history score.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A prior foreign conviction “may be count ed as a felony [for the purpose of sentencing] only if [the conviction] would both be defined as a felony in Minnesota, and the offender received a sentence that in Minnesota would be a felony-level sentence.” see also Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subd.