Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 896 N.W.2d 557.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
Ellis Scott Tooles, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Direct consequences are definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence .” (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
- Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A defendant “need not know every consequence” of his plea for it to be intelligent, but he does need to know the direct consequences, which are “definite, immediate[,] and automatic and are punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence.” (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. J. D., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is invalid,” which occurs when a plea is “not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
7 , rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
Steven Charles Perkins, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
Majed Issac Ijong, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“But a defendant need not know every consequence of his plea for the plea to be intelligent.” , rev. denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
Jamia Lee Griffith, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Direct consequences are definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence.” (citations omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But the defendant must know of the direct consequenc es of a plea, which are “definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive a nd a part of a defendant’s sentence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
8 “is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent,” but the defendant must know of the direct consequences of a plea, which are “definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A defendant need not know of every consequence of his plea for the plea to be intelligent, but he must know of the direct consequences of a plea, which are “definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive and part of a defendant’s sentence.” State v. Brown , (Minn. App .
-
A17-0435
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
5 defendant’s sentence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
- State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State v. Ellis-Strong
899 N.W.2d 531
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-59 , 2017 WL 1833317, at *1 (Minn. App. May 8,2017), that an attorney’s affirmative misadvice to a client concerning collateral consequences does not, on its own, render a guilty plea unintelligent and manifestly unjust.