Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of I.N.A., 902 N.W.2d 635.

17 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.D.B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.D.B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion if it makes “findings of fact that are unsupported by the evidence, misappl[ies] the law, or render[s] a decision that is against logic and the facts on record.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. S. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of: K. A. A., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
2 (Minn. App. 2017) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.L.B., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (a) (2024); -42 (Minn. App. 2017) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(acknowledging that a defendant’s challenge to the district court’s statutory authority to order restitution was not properly preserved), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. R. J., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“Ordinarily, appellate courts will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court.” (quotation omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. S. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(requiring written findings in juvenile-delinquency cases), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: R. R., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(b) (2018); d 635, 642 (citing Minn .
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Written findings are required in juvenile-delinquency cases to show that the district court considered vital standards and to enable the parties to understand the court’s decision.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: K. D. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 635, 640 (Minn. App. 2017), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Iepson argues that this court should consider his claim, relying on review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of M. S.-R. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Tiffany Hall, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-44 (Minn. App. 2017) (remanding because this court could not “ determine based on the record and restitution order before us whether the district court abused its discretion by making a finding unsupported by the evidence or against logic and the facts on recor d, because the [district court’s] order [was] un
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. A. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
and the general restitution statute.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. I. Q., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
and the general restitution statute.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. C. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4(D); review denied (Minn. Nov.