Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, 922 N.W.2d 185.

62 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When conducting this review, [appellate courts] view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Emily Pedersen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Cynthia Pitchford as Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of D-Angelo Pitchford, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
and resolv[ing] all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Gary Frodermann, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) Minn. 2026
In doing so, we consider the evidence in the “light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
PASCP Inc., Relator, Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2026
P. 56.01; Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, –90 (Minn. 2019); see Minn. Stat. § 271.06, subd.
Fabyanske Westra Hart & Thomson PA v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
At Home Apartments, L.L.C., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC , (quotation omitted).
Coleen Christensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Kent Michael Vnuk (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (applying this standard in an 6 appeal from summary judgment).
Jonathan David Fritz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Willis Jonathon David Carmack, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
In re the Trust of Elizabeth A. Ronning & Wallace K. Ronning. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When reviewing a summary-judgment decision, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party [] and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (stating that “our precedent is clear that bar owners, as do all innkeepers, have a duty of care .
Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Zev Oman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, d 185, 190 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).
Jacob Pries, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The supreme court recently observed that it has limited the implied-primary-assumption doctrine to only certain types of situations, “largely in the arena of participants and spectators of inherently dangerous sports.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC , (quotation omitted).
Charles Andrew Herold, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Dale Zubke, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Benjamin Unke, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But “[s]ummary judgment is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence present ed.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC , d 185, 190 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).
Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 7 N.W.3d 405 Minn. 2024
Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 7 N.W.3d 405 Minn. 2024
“Summary judgment is ‘inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.’ ” See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quoting Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc., ).
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (“[O]ur precedent is clear that bar owners, as do all innkeepers, have a duty of care.”); Swanson v. Dugout, Inc., (explaining that the “operator of an establishment where beer and liquor are sold has the duty to see to it that a patron is not injured by vicious and dr
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, –90 (Minn. 2019) (describing the summary judgment standard).
Bill Creger v. City of Cambridge Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bill Creger v. City of Cambridge Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Res., (citing Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, ).
Board of Directors, Colony by the Greens Townhome Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC , -90 (Minn. 2019).
Freedom Kerkula, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Grace Elizabeth Bettie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Craig A Reichel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Summary judgment is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC , (quotation omitted).
Adam Dowd, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Platinum Edge Properties, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When reviewing a summary-judgment decision, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court reviews “a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Wayne E. Hukriede, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Summary judgment is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from 4 the evidence presented.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Minn. 2023
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Minnesota Sporting Clays Association, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
JMH Land Development Company LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Gene Stengel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Jerome Richard Lannon (deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, (applying this standard on appeal from summary judgment); Pietsch v. Minn. Bd.
Sunlight Senior Living I LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Summary judgment “is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, - 90 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).
Nancy Wambach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Randi Rock, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
James L. Lang, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Suzanne Krupp, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We review a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson, Minn. 2022
See Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, d 185, 190 (Minn. 2019).
Steven Lee Mittelstaedt, et al., Minn. 2022
Hensen v. Uptown Drink, LLC

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by