Cited by

nry’s motion, finding that Henry “failed to make a plausible showing that the records sought will be favorable and material to his defense.” Appellate courts review a district court’s denial of a motion for in camera review for an abuse of discretion, which occurs when the district court’s decision is contrary to 13 law or “is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted); (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to review a district court ruling on a motion f

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

Accordingly, “when a defendant is found guilty of both first-degree and second-degree murder, [they] may be convicted of only one or the other, but not both.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

Specifically, the district court must examine the circumstances actually 7 surrounding the making of the statements.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion if it makes a decision “based on an erroneous view of the law” or if its decision is “against logic and the facts in the record.” d 281, 291 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).

A court “abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“Any speculation about tampering may well affect the weight of the evidence but does not affect its admissibility.” (quotation omitted).

“The decision to admit hearsay statements under Rule 807 has two steps.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“‘A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic 4 and the facts in the record.’” ().

“A district 12 court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when a sentence is “based on an erroneous view of the law.”

An a buse of discretion occurs when a court’s “decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A 16 district court abuses its discret ion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

The district court abuses its discretion when a sentence is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“Consequently, if relevant evidence has the effect of persuading the jury through illegitimate means, it must be excluded from trial.”

“Consequently, if relevant evidence has the effect of persuading the jury through illegitimate means, it must be excluded from trial.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

We afford great deference to a district court’s decision to sentence within the guidelines range and will only reverse when the district court abuses its discretion, Soto, d at 307–08, meaning that the district court based its decision on “an erroneous 8 view of the law or [its decision] is against logic and the facts in the record,” (quotation omitted).