Cited by

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).

A district court “abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

“Although prior sworn statements— 7 made under oath and subject to cross-examination —are generally more reliable than unsworn statements, [the supreme court has] noted that a totality of the circumstances approach should be used in evaluating the trustworthiness of the statement regardless of whether the statement was sworn or unsworn.” ().

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on “an erroneous view of the law or [its decision] is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against 6 logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

Accordingly, the “ decision to admit hearsay statements under Rule 807 has two steps.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

nry’s motion, finding that Henry “failed to make a plausible showing that the records sought will be favorable and material to his defense.” Appellate courts review a district court’s denial of a motion for in camera review for an abuse of discretion, which occurs when the district court’s decision is contrary to 13 law or “is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted); (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to review a district court ruling on a motion f

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

Accordingly, “when a defendant is found guilty of both first-degree and second-degree murder, [they] may be convicted of only one or the other, but not both.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

Specifically, the district court must examine the circumstances actually 7 surrounding the making of the statements.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion if it makes a decision “based on an erroneous view of the law” or if its decision is “against logic and the facts in the record.” d 281, 291 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).

A court “abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“Any speculation about tampering may well affect the weight of the evidence but does not affect its admissibility.” (quotation omitted).

“The decision to admit hearsay statements under Rule 807 has two steps.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“‘A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic 4 and the facts in the record.’” ().

“A district 12 court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when a sentence is “based on an erroneous view of the law.”

An a buse of discretion occurs when a court’s “decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).