Cited by

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“Unless the aggregate of the evidence in the record creates a sufficient doubt of the defendant’s competence, [an appellate court] will not find error in a district court’s failure to order a [competency] evaluation.” (quotations omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion if its decision is based on an error of law or is “against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court’s denial of a Paradee motion is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, which occurs when the district court’s decision applies “an erroneous view of the law” or “is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted) ; (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to review district court ruling on a Paradee motion).

The first step examines “the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the hearsay statement has circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.” (quotation omitted) .

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision “is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

the settings on the phone or the name of the camera application, and did not know if the photos could have been “manipulated.” But in the context of suspect chain-of-custody foundation, our supreme court has held foundation sufficient “when there is a ‘reasonabl[e] probab[ility] that tampering or substitution did not occur,’ and the evidence is what the proponent claims.” d 281, 303 (Minn. 2019) (alterations in original) ().

In considering the propriety of a prosecutor’s argument, we “look 8 to the closing argument as a whole, rather than to selected phrases and remarks.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

- 01 (Minn. 2019) (noting claim of juror bias fails against juror not impaneled); (concluding defendant not deprived of right to fair and impartial jury when “neither alternate juror participated in the jury’s deliberations or decision”).

“ A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A determination [by the district court] that a statement meets the foundational requirements of a hearsay exception is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”

5 v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted) .

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an 10 erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

” , 291 (Minn. 2019) (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

As noted above, when prosecutorial-misconduct claims arise from a closing argument, “ we look to the closing argument as a whole, rather than to selected phrases and remarks.” (quotation omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its 9 decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

When evaluating alleged prosecutorial misconduct during a closing argument, we “look to the closing argument as a whole, rather than to selected phrases and remarks.” (quotation s omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted) .

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (Minn .

807; - 93 (Minn. 2019) (stating that the district court first evaluates “the totality of the circumstances to determine whether [the] hearsay statement has circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness ” and then must “determine whether the three enumerated requirements of Rule 807 are met ” (alteration in original)