Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner, 487 N.W.2d 921.

69 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” see Peterka v. 14 Peterka, (stating that an income determination is a finding of fact).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 921, 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01 (stating that findings of fact “shall not be set aside unless clearly 16 erroneous”); (“Fi ndings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01 (stating that findings of fact “shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”); (“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(child support); d 921, 923 (Minn. App. 1992) (spousal maintenance) .
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(citing Gessner v. Gessner , Minn. R. Civ.
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bissell v. Bissell , 291 Minn. 348 , , 427 (1971) ; Gessner v. Gessner , , 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Dennis D. Dickinson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
P. 52.01; see also Peterka v. Peterka , (“A district court’s determination of income for maintenance purposes is a finding of fact and is not set aside unless clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance mus t be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gessner v. Gessner , , 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Julie Lynn Duesenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact c oncerning spousal maintenance must be 5 upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Gessner v. Gessner
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Melius, d at 414; (stating that we will uphold a district 10 court’s findings of facts regarding spousal maintenance unless they are clearly erroneous).
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Gessner v. Gessner
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Ann Gronvall, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Teresa J. Bulen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court’s “[f]indings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Minn. R. Civ.
John Frederick Stolte, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court applies a clear -error standard of review to a district court’s findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance, and an abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s decision regarding whether to modify an existing maintenance award, Hecker, d at 709-10.
In re the Marriage of: Lori Elaine Coleal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D'Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D'Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Lori Austin Sager v. Rene Gerold Sager Minn. Ct. App. 2015

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by