Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner, 487 N.W.2d 921.

69 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Tracie Kay Fowler v. Erwin James Fowler, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” see Peterka v. 14 Peterka, (stating that an income determination is a finding of fact).
In re the Marriage of: Daniel Stephen Nelson v. Katherine Lynn Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 921, 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Mark David Plucinski v. Ellen Marie Budzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill v. Gregory High Perrill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01 (stating that findings of fact “shall not be set aside unless clearly 16 erroneous”); (“Fi ndings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara v. Nihad Salah Awad Hamed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 52.01 (stating that findings of fact “shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”); (“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie v. Heidi Christine Aufenthie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: John Edward Warrington, and Karen Lee Warrington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(child support); d 921, 923 (Minn. App. 1992) (spousal maintenance) .
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins v. Margaret Foster Hudgins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler v. Michelle Marie Keeler Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Judy Ann Jacques v. Nicholas Melvin Jacques Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff v. Kurt D. Duhn Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning v. Daniel H. Gruenstein Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders v. Joseph James Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(citing Gessner v. Gessner , Minn. R. Civ.
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bissell v. Bissell , 291 Minn. 348 , , 427 (1971) ; Gessner v. Gessner , , 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway v. Kent Bradford Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Laura Diane Hermer v. Lawrence James Cisek, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Dennis D. Dickinson v. Marymargaret Dickinson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
P. 52.01; see also Peterka v. Peterka , (“A district court’s determination of income for maintenance purposes is a finding of fact and is not set aside unless clearly erroneous.”).
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan v. Smeeta Antony Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance mus t be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gessner v. Gessner , , 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In re the Marriage of: Julie Lynn Duesenberg v. Michael James Duesenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger v. Richard C. Dreger Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan v. Jacqueline Ann Hoolihan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact c oncerning spousal maintenance must be 5 upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Gessner v. Gessner
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski v. Joan Susanne Pnewski Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Melius, d at 414; (stating that we will uphold a district 10 court’s findings of facts regarding spousal maintenance unless they are clearly erroneous).
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs v. David Carl Boggs Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Gessner v. Gessner
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran v. Vadivazhaghi Kannan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Ann Gronvall v. Kalmar Gene Gronvall Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Teresa J. Bulen v. Michael E. Bulen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon v. Steven Robert Fenlon Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court’s “[f]indings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.” Minn. R. Civ.
John Frederick Stolte v. Kathleen Marie Stolte Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court applies a clear -error standard of review to a district court’s findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance, and an abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s decision regarding whether to modify an existing maintenance award, Hecker, d at 709-10.
In re the Marriage of: Lori Elaine Coleal v. David Michael Coleal Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams v. Cheryl Constance Stevens Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D’Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D’Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
In re the Marriage of: Lori Austin Sager v. Rene Gerold Sager Minn. Ct. App. 2015