Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Abdisalan, 661 N.W.2d 691.

42 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When reviewing a district court’s decision denying a motion to withdraw a plea, we consider “the entire context in which [a defendant’s] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
And the state may not secure a guilty plea “through actual or threate ned physical harm or by mental coercion [that] ‘overbear[s] the will of the 12 defendant.’” (), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Oluwatoyin Emmanuel Aina Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Oluwatoyin Emmanuel Aina Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When reviewing a plea-withdrawal decision, we consider “the entire context in which [the] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Sharmark Hussein Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Sharmark Hussein Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The state may not secure a guilty plea “through actual or threatened physical harm or by mental coercion that ‘overbear[s] the will of the defendant.’” (), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“A plea of guilty must not be the product of coercion.”) , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
presented to and considered by the district court in making its decision) ; rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This court also considers “the entire context in which [the defendant ]’s plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The record shows that Moran failed to comprehend “ the nature, purpose, and consequences of his plea.” , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(affirming district court’s decision to deny withdrawal of plea under the fair-and- just standard where “[n]othing objectively in the record suggests that [defendant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of his plea”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In addition, the district court may consider “the entire context in which [the defendant’s] plea of guilty occurred , as demonstrated by the record.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We consider, “the entire context in which [the defendant’s] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion .” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Felix Kasper Piah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court should also consider, “the entire context in which [the d efendant’s] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating “the entire context” in which the plea occurred, “as demonstrated by the record,” must be considered in determining 5 whether the district court abused its discretion in denying a plea -withdrawal motion), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This court may consider “the entire context in which [the defendant’s] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Abdisalan , (affirming district court’s decision to deny withdrawal of plea under fair-and-just standard where “[n]othing objectively in the record suggests that [defe ndant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of his plea”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Abdisalan , review denied (Minn. Aug.
, A17-1281 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(rejecting defendant’s argument that decision to accept plea was made in haste where defendant knew of a possible plea agreement two days before he decided to plead guilty ), reviewed denied (Minn. June 3, 2003); Id.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Yet Wynn also implicitly concedes that his plea-withdrawal motion and the evidence presented at the plea-withdrawal hearing did not raise the issue of plea validity below, review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ramirez-Diaz may have acted quickly, but this “fact is relevant to show an absence of prejudicial reliance on his plea by the prosecution.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Elroy James Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Elroy James Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Raleigh, d at 96 (rejecting claim that defendant pleaded guilty due to fear of receiving death penalty when defendant “offer[ed] no support in the record for [the] argument”); Ecker, d at 719 (rejecting defendant’s assertion of pressure or coercion to plead guilty when no showing was made of mental coercion overbearing defendant’s will); -95 (Minn. App. 2003) (rejecting claim that defendant was coerced to plead guilty even when defense counsel told defendant that “there was a 70% chance that
State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(affirming district court’s decision to deny plea-withdrawal under the fair-and-just standard where “[n]othing objectively in the record suggests that [defendant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of his plea”).
Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that withdrawal was not appropriate when “[n]othing objectively in the record suggest[ed] that [the defendant] failed to comprehend the nature, purpose, and consequences of [the] plea”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Raleigh, d at 97 (reviewing plea hearing transcript and determining there was no support for assertion that plea was coerced); −95 (Minn. App. 2003) (considering entire context of plea as demonstrated by record, and holding defendant failed to show any support that his plea was coerced), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
We also consider “the entire context in which [the defendant’s] plea of guilty occurred, as demonstrated by the record.” review denied (Minn. Aug.