Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murr…, 487 N.W.2d 857.

55 citing documents.

Reyzl Grace MoChridhe v. Academy of Holy Angels, Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Reyzl Grace MoChridhe v. Academy of Holy Angels, Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Hill-Murray High Sch.
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Hill- Murray High Sch., see also McClure, d at 853.
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
v. Hill-Murray High Sch.
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Hill -Murray High Sch., Maplewood, Minn., ; see also Minn. Stat. § 179.10, subd.
In the Application of Jose Luis Gutierrez for a change of legal name to Lazarus Twist. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Hill-Murray High Sch.
In the Matter of the Application of Anthony Theodore Wagoner for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
is overriding or compelling,” and (4) “the state regulation uses the least restrictive means.” Hill-Murray Fed’n
Amos Mast, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Application of: Hollis John Larson for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hill-Murray Fed’n d 857, 865 (Minn. 1992).
In the Matter of the Application of Russell Vincent Winbush for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hill-Murray Fed’n d 857, 865 ( Minn. 1992).
Daniel A. Vogel, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Hill-Murray Fed’n (providing that a successful free-exercise challenge under the Minnesota Constitution requires a party to establish, among other things, that state action violated sincerely held religious beliefs).
Minn. 2019
Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brad Ronald Stevens. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
He contends that his continued supervision at the MSOP violates his right under the Minnesota Constitution “to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience.” Minn. Const. art. I, § 16; see also Hill-Murray Fed’n -65 (Minn. 1992).
Meeker County, petitioner, Respondent, Victoria Lynn Moreno, n/k/a Victoria Lynn Baalson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“This test has f our prongs: whether the objector’s belief is sincerely held; whether the state regulation burdens the exercise of religious beliefs; whether the state interest in the regulation is overriding or compelling; and whether the state regulation uses the least restrictive means.” Hill-Murray Fed’n
Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In evaluating the constitutionality of statutes that are challenged based on violations of freedom of conscience, the supreme court has “retain[ed] the compelling state interest balancing test.” Hill-Murray Fed’n
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
3020 ; Odenthal, d at 435 ; Hill-Murray Fed’n -64 (Minn.1992); -01 (Minn.1982).
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hill-Murray Fed’n -65 (Minn.1992); Hershberger, d at 397 .
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hill-Murray Fed’n 289 (Minn.1989).
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Tate 682 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Tate 682 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Hill-Murray Fed’ State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Education Minnesota-Intermediate District No. 917, Local 3904 v. Intermediate School District No. 917 660 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Petition for Clarification 660 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Petition for Clarification 660 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ass'n, d at 529 (holding that licensure requirement of position, not job functions of employees, is determinative in resolving whether positions should be placed in teacher bargaining unit); -68 (Minn.1992) (holding that bureau's unit determination, which excluded supervisory positions and music and religion teachers, was supported by the record).
Education Minnesota-Intermediate District No. 917, Local 3904 v. Intermediate School District No. 917 660 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ass’n, d at 529 (holding that licensure requirement of position, not job functions of employees, is determinative in resolving whether positions should be placed in teacher bargaining unit); see also Hill-Murray Fed’n v. Hill-Murray High School, -68 (Minn.1992) (holding that bureau’s unit determination, which excluded supervisory positions and music and religion teachers, was supported by the record).
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 649 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2002
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 649 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2002
State v. Tenerelli 598 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1999
State v. Schwartz 598 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Schwartz 598 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
He contends accordingly that the court’s action in revoking his probation must be tested against the criteria in Hill-Murray Fed’n (noting that courts use four-pronged test to determine whether state regulation of religious belief violates Minn. Const, art. I, § 16).
In Re Estate of Palmen 574 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Basich v. Board of Pensions (ELCA) 540 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Basich v. Board of Pensions (ELCA) 540 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by