Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg, 538 N.W.2d 489.

79 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Richard Charles Graves Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But the appellant bears “the burden to provide an adequate record.” see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the SUPERVISED Estate of David Victor Page, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2026
see also Thorp Loan & (explaining that self- represented litigants are not relieved of this burden), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
All In Sober Living, LLC v. Stephen Beaulieu Minn. Ct. App. 2026
An appellant bears “the burden to provide an adequate record.”
State of Minnesota v. Finest Andre Nickens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Messan Adjignon v. Oro Lounge Bar Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record.”
In re the Marriage of: Cody Allen Gilbert v. Brenda Nicole Gilbert Minn. Ct. App. 2026
However, without a sufficient record, our review for such challenges is “limited to deciding whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.”
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke, St. Louis County Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, the reviewing court is limited to deciding whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.”
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, the reviewing court is limited to deciding whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.”
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. R. D., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Guardianship of the Person of Lance Alvin Melser, In re the Guardianship of Cory James Wojtowicz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, the reviewing court is limited to deciding whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.” Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg
In Re the Marriage of: Katherine Patterson v. Jerry Lyn Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, this court’s review is limited to whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.” see Duluth Herald & News Tri b. v. Plymouth Optical Co. , (stating that without a transcript, “this court is not cognizant of the evidence upon which the [district] court based its findings of fact”).
Ann Riley, James Lucius v. Harris Builders, Inc., Mid State Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And “[a]n appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record.” .
Groebner and Associates, Inc. v. VW Dig LLC, d/b/a VW Connect, an Arizona limited liablity company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Paul Hansmeier v. Tobies Enterprises, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record.”
In the Matter of Rebecca Halling OBO Minor Children v. Francis Halling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of Rebecca Halling OBO Minor Children v. Francis Halling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When, as here, “an appellant fails to provide a transcript, the reviewing court is limited to deciding whether the trial court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.”
Natasha Siefker Cook and o/b/o Minor Children v. Tobin Jack Cook Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Carl Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Because the state has the burden of providing an adequate record, we decline to review the district court’s factual findings .
State of Minnesota v. David NMN Alonzo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
( stating “[a]n 17 appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record” on appeal).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Estate of James J. Fiorentino, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Mario Patino Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Croix Holdings, LLC v. City of Newport Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(stating that the appealing party bears the burden of providing an adequate record for appellate review).
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah v. Felitrice Nina Boimah Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ellis Evans v. Ian Niklas Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El v. Jeff Titus, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Michael Nassif v. Lowell Penz, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Gerald L. Trooien v. Talon OP, L.P., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 489, 494 (Minn. App. 1995).
In the Matter of the Application of Russell Vincent Winbush for a Change of Name Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg
In re the Marriage of: Denise Marie Kienholz v. Douglas Floyd Kienholz Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 489, 493 (Minn. App. 1995).
Murphy Dressen Consulting, LLC v. CloudCover, Ltd., CloudCover Risk Solutions, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brian Allen Platt v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2019
.”); Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg , (holding that, in the absence of a transcript, this 6 court’s review is limited to whether the district court’s conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact).
Greg Peterson v. City of Richfield Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(a); (providing that appellant bears the burden of providing an adequate record).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. P. and A. S. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
5b(d) (199 4); (“There are only a limited number of issues that may be raised in a direct appeal from a default judgment.
Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program 896 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program 896 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Terri Lyn Swart, Kandiyohi County v. Tracy Donald Swart Minn. Ct. App. 2017
7 court’s decision on a purely legal issue.”
State of Minnesota v. Brock William Orwig Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brock William Orwig Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Husband Did Not Waive His Right to Contest Personal Jurisdiction Having concluded that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over husband does not end our analysis because the lack of personal jurisdiction is a defense that may be waived.6
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
17, 2001) (reviewing denial of motion to vacate dissolution judgment and noting that “[b]ecause of similarities between rule 60.02 and subdivision 2 [of section 518.145], cases citing to rule 60.02 are often used when addressing the application of the statute”); 493−94 (Minn. App. 1995) (reviewing denial of motion to vacate default dissolution judgment, noting that “[t]he appropriate method to seek review of a default judgment in a marriage dissolution proceeding is to move the trial court for r
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record.”
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thiele, d at 582; (appellant bears the burden of providing an adequate record).
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016