Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Youker v. Youker, 661 N.W.2d 266.

44 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 266, 269 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2(a); Although these statutory sections relate to the computation of child support, caselaw instructs that the definition of gross income in section 518A.29 applies to both child support and spousal maintenance.
In re the Marriage of: Allan Roland Kilgore v. Ellen Lea Brockman, f/k/a Ellen Lea Kilgore, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Allan Roland Kilgore v. Ellen Lea Brockman, f/k/a Ellen Lea Kilgore, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
was originally set.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. 6 Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
2; d 266, 269 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Sundbom Otterson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Maintenance awards are not altered on appeal unless the district court abused its wide discretion.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Marcia A. Hammond, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Youker v. Youker , 7 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
2(a) (2018); see Youker v. Youker , (stating that the moving party must first demonstrate substantially changed circumstances, then “demonstrate that the change renders the original award unreasonable and unfair”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hecker v. Hecker , (holding that maintenance recipient’s inability to meet her needs frustrated “the parties’ expectations of self -sufficiency” and constituted a substantial change in circumstances); 22 (“If, despite the obligee’s reasonable efforts, the spouse fails to become fully rehabilitated, that failure may constitute a change in circumstances.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Erika Lynn Huerta, nka Erika Lynn Mazzitello, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
2(a) (2018); review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Walter Eidem, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Youker v. Youker , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Gregory Olstad, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Youker v. Youker , , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Ann Gronvall, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
John Frederick Stolte, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hecker v. Hecker , ; , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
gh no fault or choice of the party”) 3 The district court temporarily reduced hu sband’s spousal-maintenance obligation “to $1,500 from August 2015 thr ough February 2016,” because husband had “a lapse in employment due to no fault of his own that re sulted in decreased earnings for a period of months.” 5 (2016); (explaining that the moving party carries the burden of proof in demonstr ating that there has been a substantial change in circumstances), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen M. Johnson v. Jeffrey C. Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen M. Johnson v. Jeffrey C. Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“After the district court issues a spousal-maintenance award, it has broad discretion to determine whether to later modify that award.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia A. Kuzara, f/k/a Patricia A. McDermott v. John R. McDermott, Hennepin County, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Patricia A. Kuzara, f/k/a Patricia A. McDermott v. John R. McDermott, Hennepin County, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
[award] was originally set.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“After temporary maintenance has been awarded, an obligee generally has the duty to rehabilitate.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Beverly Abuzzahab v. Faruk Said Abuzzahab Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Beverly Abuzzahab v. Faruk Said Abuzzahab Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A district court abuses its discretion when it resolves a matter in a manner that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A party moving to modify an award of maintenance bears the burden of showing a substantial change of circumstances since the last time maintenance *717 was modified or, if maintenance has not been modified, since it was originally set.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Grachek v. Grachek 750 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marriage of Grachek v. Grachek 750 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
review denied (Minn. Aug.