Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch, 502 N.W.2d 796.
-
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, Inc., v. Bloch, -01 (Minn. App. 1993); see Vlahos v. R&I Constr.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, d 796, 800-01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minn. Stat. § 480A.08 (2018); Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (holding that, although not binding prece dent, unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
A19-0155
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
-
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. F., J. G.-T. N., and …
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Dynamic Air, (holding that, although not binding precedent, unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (noting that unpubli shed opinions 12 of the court of appeals are not precedential but may be persuas ive).
-
A19-0239
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 (2018); see Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (noting that although persuasive, “[t]he legislature has unequivocally provided that unpublished opinions are not precedential”).
- State v. Scheffler 932 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State v. Scheffler
932 N.W.2d 57
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 (2018) ; Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800-01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Alla K. Popovich, as wife and Guardian Ad Litem for Aleksandr M. Popovich, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
25, 2012), we upheld dismissal of a medical-malpractice claim in favor of a hospital, noting that “Minnesota does not recogn ize a medical -malpractice claim against a hospital based on the doctrine of apparent authority.” See also Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (holding that, while not binding, unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
Kevin Robert Miller, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Second, other than citing to our decision in Dynamic Air, which stands for the proposition that unpublished opinions of this court are not binding precedent, appellant fails to support his position with legal authori ty accompanied by a coherent argument.
-
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 (2018); see Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that “unpublished opinions are not precedential” and at best “can be of persuasive value”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , -01 5 (Minn. App. 1993) (noting that unpublished opinions of the cour t of appeals are not precedential but may be persuasive ).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jones is not binding authority and has persuasive value, “[a]t best.” Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (addressing dangers of miscitation and unfairness associated with the use of unpublished opinions and stating that “[t]he legislature has unequivo cally provided that unpublished decisions are not precedential”); see Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
- Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State 927 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State
927 N.W.2d 327
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3(c) (2018) ("Unpublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential."); Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800-01 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating dangers of miscitation and unfairness associated with use of unpublished opinions).
- Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell 925 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of Sartell
925 N.W.2d 255
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Loomis , No. C6-96-1278, 1997 WL 118251 , at *2 (Minn. App. 1997) ; see Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800 (Minn. App. 1993) (holding that, although not binding precedent, unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
In re the Matter of the Maltreatment Appeal of Watta Yanor Kamara.
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, d 796, 800 (Minn. App. 1993) (“Unpublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential.
- State v. Defatte 921 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State v. Defatte
921 N.W.2d 556
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3 (2016) ("Unpublished opinions of the court of appeals are not precedential."); Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800 (Minn. App. 1993) (holding that, although not binding precedent, unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
Distinguished
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. J. L., Parent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (2016); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that, while “of persuasive value,” unpublished opinions “are not precedential”).
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (stating that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals may have persuasive value).
-
Medtronic, Inc., et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (2016); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (“Unpublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential.”); Dynamic Air, (“At best, [unpublished] opinions can be of persuasive value.”).
-
Neil N. Lapidus, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the court finds the covenant to be necessary, it must consider the reasonablen ess of the scope of the covenant” and the covenant “must not impose any greater restric tion on the employee than is necessary to protect the employer’s business.” Dynamic Air
- State v. Minn. Sch. of Bus., Inc. 915 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State v. Minn. Sch. of Bus., Inc.
915 N.W.2d 903
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that it is "improper to rely on unpublished opinions as binding precedent").
-
Shonwta Demar Jackson, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (2016); Dynamic Air
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Dynamic Air, (holding that unpublished opinions offer persuasive value “[a]t best”).
- State v. Roy 910 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State v. Roy
910 N.W.2d 477
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , , 800-01 (Minn. App. 1993) (noting that although unpublished opinions of this court are not precedential, they may be persuasive).
- In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
Donald Dean Oberfoell, individually and Do-Bid Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Do-Bid Online Auctions, Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
When examining the reasonableness of a restrictive covenant, the district court should consider “the nature and character of the employment, the nature and extent of the business, the time for which the restriction is imposed, the territorial extent of the covenant, and other pertinent conditions.” Dynamic Air
-
A17-0564
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(c) (2016) ; Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , -01 (Minn. App. 1993) .
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
- Garlyn, Inc., d/b/a Polzin Glass, Inc. as assignee of Wehling, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
3(c) (2016) (“Unpublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential.”); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993) (concluding that unpublished opinions may be persuasive).
-
Madeline Guminiak, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But u npublished opinions are not precedential, Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
- In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Criticized In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Bethany Good, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
3(c) (2016); Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
- Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
- RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Bloomington, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2004) (stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential) (citing Dynamic Air, ).
- Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Unpublished decisions may be cited only for their “persuasive value.” Dynamic Air, –01 (Minn. App. 1993).