Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch, 502 N.W.2d 796.
- In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt AKA John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Anthony B Graham, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
In the Matter of the Minnesota Racing Commission’s Approval of Running Aces Casino, Hotel & Racetrack’s Request to …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Dynamic Air, –01 (Minn. App. 1993) (observing that unpublished opinions, although not precedential, may offer persuasive reasoning).
- Oehlerts & Sons Construction, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1(c); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1(c) (stating that nonprecedential opinions may be cited as persuasive authority); Dynamic Air, (stating that nonprecedential opinions “can be of persuasive value”).
- Michael L. Pogreba v. Lorraine Pogreba, Janet Bowen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Michael L. Pogreba v. Lorraine Pogreba, Janet Bowen
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1(c); Dynamic Air, (stating that nonprecedential opinions by the court of appeals are not binding but “can be of persuasive value”).
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Daniel Neumiller Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Robert Daniel Neumiller
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Dynamic Air, –01 (Minn. App. 1993) (observing that unpublished opinions, although not precedential, may offer persuasive reasoning).
- State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lee Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lee Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- AgCountry Farm Credit Services, PCA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Dynamic Air, (stating that unpublished opinions are not binding on the court of appeals but may be considered for their persuasive value).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dynamic Air, d 796, 800 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Xanth Tyler Wilkins, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Id.; Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
- Health Care Service Corporation, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Matthew Braith, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dynamic Air, Dyrdal, d at 586 n.1 (citing Dynamic Air for the principle that nonprecedential opinions have only persuasive value).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dynamic Air, - 01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Paul Herlache, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Dynamic Air, (stating that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals, now designated as nonprecedential opinions, are not precedential but may have persuasive value).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Kay L. Briden, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Clayton Douglas Groves, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1(c); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dynamic Air, d 796, 800 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Distinguished
Peter Stalland, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Dynamic Air, (providing that unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent).
- Builders Association of the Twin Cities, d/b/a Housing First Minnesota, Petitioner, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (explaining that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent).
-
Ernesto Reyes-Alcazar, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Cf. Dynamic Air, (observing that unpublished decisions are not precedential but may be persuasive).
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. C. and C. L. S., Parents.
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , (“At best, these opinions can be of persuasive value.”) ; see Minn. R. Civ.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Second, we determine “whether the circumstances proved are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational 5 The state also cites and contrasts severa l unpublished opinions of this court, but unpublished opinions are not binding, Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , and the choice of standard depends on the specific evidence presented in this case.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Dynamic Air, (holding that unpublished opinions are of persuasive value “[a]t best”).
-
Eric John Blehr, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , 10 (stating that nonprecedential decision may have persuasive value); see also TCI Bus.
-
Distinguished
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
This evidence 5 Although unpublished decisions of this court are not precedential, Dynamic Air, WL 1846451 (Minn. App. Apr.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Bauer, No. A18- 0876, 2019 WL 10733147, at *4-5 (Minn. App. July 1, 2019); see also Dynamic Air, –01 (Minn. App. 1993) (observing that unpublished opinions, although not precedential, may offer persuasive reasoning).
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
-
Timberwall Landscape & Masonry Products, Inc., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , d 796, 800-01 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that “unpublished opinions are not precedential”).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Dynamic Air, d 796, 800 (Minn. App. 1993) (“ Unpublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential.” ).
-
Midland Funding LLC, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3(c) (2018); see also Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3 (2018); Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , -01 (Minn. App. 1993) .
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch , Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
-
Charlene Hughes, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3( c) (2018); Dynamic Air
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3(c) (2018); see also Dynamic Air
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
-
Distinguished
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of Commissioner of Human Services, Legal Custodian.
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 (2018); Dynamic Air, -01 (Minn. App. 1993).
- Laureen Dvorak, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019