Cited by

(“[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”).

On appeal, “error is never presumed,” and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” (quotation omitted); (applying this principle from Loth in a criminal case), aff’d on other grounds

[and] the burden of showing error 9 rests upon the one who relies upon it.”); (quoting Waters in a family-law appeal).

[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”); (quoting Waters); (applying Loth).

P. 61 (requiring harmless error to be ignored); (stating that “error without prejudice is not ground for reversal” (quotation omitted)).

[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” (quotation omitted).

(explaining that “error is never presumed” on appeal, that it “must be made to appear affirmatively” before a reviewing court can reverse, and that the burden of showing error rests upon the party who asserts it); (citing Loth).

(applying this aspect of Loth).

(noting that error is “never” presumed on appeal); (stating that appellate courts “cannot presume error by the district court”); (citing Loth).

(“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.

(explaining that on appeal, error is never presumed, it must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal, and the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it).

(stating that “on appeal error is never 30 presumed,” and placing the burden of showing prejudice on appellant (quotation omitted)).

d 278, 283 (Minn. App. 1999) ().

[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”); (quoting this aspect of Waters in a family-law appeal); (applying this aspect of Loth ).

( (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed” (quotation omitted))).

6 But we do not read the order as providing for such broad disqualification, and “on appeal error is never presumed.”

[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); (discussing Waters); (applying Loth).

(quotation omitted); (applying this principle from Loth in a criminal case), aff’d on other grounds

of A.D.B., (citing this aspect of D.J.N.); (stating that “ on appeal error is never presumed,” and placing the burden of showing prejudice on appellant (quotations omitted)).

2006-OA1, -78 (Minn. App. 2009) (), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (stating that we decline to consider inadequately briefed issues); (“[O]n appeal, error is never presumed.

upon the one who relies upon it”); (quoting this aspect of Waters in a family law appeal); (applying this aspect of Loth).

of A.D.B., (citing this aspect of D.J.N.); (stating, in a marital dissolution appeal, that “error is never presumed,” and the burden of showing prejudice lies with appellant).

Because it is Deward’s burden to show prejudice, (requiring appellant to demonstrate prejudice).

[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944)

See Kenney, d at 221 (stating that findings 23 are clearly erroneous only “when they are manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence”); (“[O]n appeal, error is never presumed.

(“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.

P. 61 (re quiring courts to ignore harmless error); (stating that error without prejudice is not grounds to reverse).

( holding that we do not presume error on appeal, and the party asserting error has the burden of showing it).

Second , “error is never presumed.”

(stating that we do not presum e error on appeal).

[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Loth v. Loth , (quotation omitted).

While he asks us to “review the totality of his case,” appellate courts do not determine issues of fact on appeal, and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it,” Loth v. Loth , (quotation omitted).