Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 147 N.W.2d 100.

58 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (applying this aspect of Dieseth in a family-law ap
All Around Property Preservation, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (“Even though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (stating that, “[e]ven though the decision of the [district] court .
City of Blaine Police Department, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., see also In re Welfare of Child(ren) of L.A.B., d 136, 146 n.9 (Minn. App. 2025) (applying this aspect of Dieseth).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: L. A. B. and C. R. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: L. A. B. and C. R. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); T.M.A., d at 360 (citing Dieseth in an appeal involving a transfer of permanent legal and physical custo
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (explaining that a district court’s decision is final after the time for appeal has expired).
In re the Guardianship of Gretchen Lucking. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. M. A. and M. J. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. M. A. and M. J. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (“Even though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”); WL 958476, at *4 (Minn. App. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. D. D. and D. A. A., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. D. D. and D. A. A., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (stating, in a civil case, that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); WL 958476, at *4 (Minn. App. Mar.
A23-0893 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the [district] court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (citing this aspect of Dieseth).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the [district] court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”); see also Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In the Matter of the Mary Kristen Francis Revocable Trust Agreement. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though decision of the [district] court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order, it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (citing this aspect of Dieseth).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A.K., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (“Even though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”); (applying this aspect of Dieseth in family law appeal)
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. R. J. and B. J. J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (stating, in a civil case, that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (stating both that public polic
Distinguished City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., ).1 1 We reject LAD’s argument that Erickson conflicts with Regents.
In re the Supervised Estate of: Delbert W Waara, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (citing this aspect of Dieseth).
Alison Margaret Perry, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , (applying this aspect of Dieseth in family law appeal), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 2006).
In re the Matter of: Brooks J. Waldron, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable or der it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”); 13 Dailey v. Chermak , (applying this aspect of Dieseth in fami
In the Matter of Shah & Company, Ltd, Firm Permit No. 01282, Ramanik Shah, CPA Certificate No. 09193, … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (stating that an appealab le order is final after the time for appeal has expired).
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if i t is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”); Dailey v. Chermak , (citing this aspect of Dieseth in family law app
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , (“Even though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”).
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Warren Rupp, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (citing this aspect of Dieseth in a family law appea
In re the Marriage of: Tiffany Elizabeth Jean Banerjee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); Dailey, d at 631 (citing this aspect of Dieseth in a family law appeal).
In the Matter of: Kari Dale Hickey, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370-71, (stating that “[e]ven though the decision of the [district] court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it 5 is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); see Hanson v. Hanson , d 230, 232 (Minn. App. 1985) (stating that a pro
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Co. , 275 Minn. 365 , , 102 (1966) )).
Johnson v. Johnson 902 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Johnson v. Johnson 902 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370-71 , (stating that “[e]ven though the décision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); (Minn.App.
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370, (stating that an appealable order is final when the deadline to appeal has expired, even if the order is wrong in certain respects).
Vene Lor, as conservator and natural mother of Ricky Yang, and Vene Lor, individually, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370, ( noting that a district court decision is final, even if incorrect, following expiration of the deadline to appeal).
In the Matter of: Jessica Jo O’Leary, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. G. and B. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. , 275 Minn. 365, 370 -71, (stating, in a civil case, that “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired”); Nussbaumer v. Fetrow , (stating
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rachel B. Sabin. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370, (“Even though the decision of the [district] court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”).
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370-71 , (stating “[e]ven though the decision of the trial court in the first order may have been wrong, if it is an appealable order it is still final after the time for appeal has expired.”).
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370-71 , (“It follows that inasmuch as the original order was appeal-able and no appeal was taken from it during the time within which that could be done, it is a final adjudication * * *.”).
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 369-70 , -03 (1966) (“An appealable order affecting substantial rights, if the matter in question has been fully tried, is as conclusive upon the issue decided as would be a final judgment.”) The district court in the prior appeal of the denial of appellant’s variance made its findings based- on it
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
Co., 275 Minn. 365, 370-71 , (holding that an appealable order is still final after the time for appeal has expired even though the decision of the trial court may have been wrong); Ossman v. Diana Corp., 825 F.Supp.