Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Noltimier v. Noltimier, 157 N.W.2d 530.

63 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Snowman Construction, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Although “we are disposed to disregard defects resulting from failure to comply with the rules of this court relating to the contents of [a pro se] brief,” a pro se appellant retains the burden to “provide an adequate record and preserve it in a settled case to enable us to review questions [the appellant] desires to raise on appeal.” Noltimier v. Noltimier , (citation omitted).
Paul Hansmeier, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This burden applies to pro se appellant s. Noltimier v. Noltimier , (per curiam).
A23-0893 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
.” ( (dismissing appeal because of an inadequate record and stating that “[e]rror cannot be presumed”)) .
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(dismissing appeal for inadequate record, stating that appellant has burden to provide adequate record on appeal).
Luisa Petrona Branscum, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, Custom Farm Servs., Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1; d 530, 531 (Minn. 1968).
In the Matter of: Mara Jareth Butler, and on behalf of minors, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(dismissing appeal for an inadequate record, stating both that “[e]rror cannot be presumed” and that appellant has burden to provide an adequate record on appeal).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Tonia N. Williams, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
see also Thorp Loan & Thrift Co. v. Morse , review denied (Minn. Apr.
A19-1654 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(dismissing an appeal of husband’s post - decree modification motion to modify child support where the record was “barr en of material necessary for an understanding of the issues”).
Midland Funding LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(dismissing appeal for an inadequate record, stating both that “[e]rror cannot be presumed” an d that the appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record on appeal).
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Diana Lynne Neumann, n/k/a Diana Lynne deVries, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(a) (stating that it is appellant’s burden to order a transcript if necessary); (stating that if the record is not sufficient to support review, the appeal may be dismissed).
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, 531 (1968) (dismissing appeal fo r an inadequate record, stating both that “[e]rror cannot be presumed” and that the appellant has th e burden to provide an adequate record on appeal).
Douglas Place Treatment Center, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, (“Error cannot be presumed.”); Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404, (“It is elementary that the party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters
In the Matter of the Medical License of S. Fred Everett, M.D., Year of Birth: 1935, License Number: … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Medical License of S. Fred Everett, M.D., Year of Birth: 1935, License Number: … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(Minn. App. 1990) (declining to address pro se appellant’s argument raised for first time on appeal, stating that “[w]hen an appellant acts as attorney pro se, appellate courts are disposed to disregard defects in the brief, but that does not relieve appellants of the necessity of providing an adequate record and preserving it in a way that will permit review” (citing Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, d 530, 531 (1968))), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., d 142, 146 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Ali John Moin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ali John Moin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Guava LLC, Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Respondents,John Doe 173.23.48.174, John Doe 24.111.103.45, John Doe … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Guava LLC, Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Respondents,John Doe 173.23.48.174, John Doe 24.111.103.45, John Doe … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Error cannot be presumed.” Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29 , (allowing dismissal of appeal based upon incomplete record).
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(citing Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29 , ).
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29 , (stating that if the record is not sufficient to support review, the appeal may be dismissed).
Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg 538 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg 538 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc. 430 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc. 430 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28 , Minn.R.
Bush v. Winter 402 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bush v. Winter 402 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29
Carpenter v. Woodvale, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1987