Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kindem, 313 N.W.2d 6.

754 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Furman Street Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We “will reverse the district court’s refusal to depart from a presumptive sentence only in a ‘rare’ case.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Timothy Days Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Timothy Days Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko Porte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The district court has “broad discretion” in sentencing, and an appellate court will only reverse a district court’s refusal to depart in a “rare case.”
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Adam Burbul Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Eric Vines Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Eric Vines Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (stating 4 that a “court may depart from the presumptive disposition” of a guidelines sentence if “there exist identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure”).
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Ann Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (stating that a “court may depart from the presumptive disposition or duration” of a guidelines sentence if “there exist identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure”).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (stating that a “court may depart from the presumptive disposition” of a guidelines sentence if “there exist identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure”).
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Abshir Abdullahi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alejandro Esteban Esquivel Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alejandro Esteban Esquivel Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Accordingly, a refusal to depart from the presumptive sentence will be reversed only in “a rare case.”
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Raymond Bye Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Weston Marshal Voeltz Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2021)
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Allen Owens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Morris Swenson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); (noting that only in a “rare case” will a reviewing court overturn a presumptive sentence); (noting that a presumptive sentence will generally not be modified “absent compelling circumstances”).
State of Minnesota v. Ger Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Michael Paul Kuklok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020) (stating that 4 a “court may depart from the presumptive disposition” of a guidelines sentence if “there exist identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure”).
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Edward Garrett Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines “when substantial and compelling circumstances are present.” see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020).
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Isaiah Antoine James Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2018)
State of Minnesota v. Sterling Royce Haukom Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020); 1 Respondent State of Minnesota charged Haukom with this crime in violation of Minnesota Statutes section 609.2112, subdivision 1(a)(2)(i) (2020).
State of Minnesota v. George Jerry Matlock Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Cha NMN Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Gordy Lee Burkhart Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from these guidelines only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (Supp. 2021)
State of Minnesota v. Robert Anthony Winston Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Collin Charles Koerner Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Tommy Junior McCall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Brandon John Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020)
State of Minnesota v. Robert Allen Mrozek Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Ramon Cantu Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Todd Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Jacob Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Scott Adams, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence only when there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (202 1)
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Virnig Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Allison Wesley Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may depart from the presumptive sentence under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines “when substantial and compelling circumstances are present.” see also Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020).