Cited by

“This court will generally not exercise its authority to modify a sentence within the presumptive range ‘absent compelling circumstances.’” (), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).

A reviewing court “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.”

When the sentence is within that range, we will not exercise our authority to modify it “absent compelling circumstances.”

a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); (noting that only in a “rare case” will a reviewing court overturn a presumptive sentence); (noting that a presumptive sentence will generally not be modified “absent compelling circumstances”).

Appellate courts “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.”

This court will reverse a district court’s imposition of a presumptive sentence only if warranted by “compelling circumstances.”

Accordingly, the applicable caselaw is the well-developed caselaw—consisting of opinions issued both before and after Cermak and Womack—that an appellate court “generally will not interfere with a sentencing court’s decision to impose a term within the presumptive sentence range.” Delk, 8 d at 428

“[W]e generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentencing range.” State v. Freyer

Appellate courts “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.” State v. Freyer , .

We only rarely reverse the imposition of a guidelines sentence, and will not modify it “absent compelling circumstances,”

We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive [guidelines] range,” State v. Freyer , and reverse imposition of 4 presumptive sentences only in “rare” cases, State v. Delk , (quoting State v. Kindem , ), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).

We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.” State v. Freyer

Although we may modify a presumptive sentence, we will not do so “absent compelling circumstances.”

We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.”

We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.” State v. Freyer , .

We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.” .

We do not modify sentences within the presumptive range “absent compelling circumstances.” see also Minn. Stat. § 244.11(b) (2014).

“[W]e generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range.”

But a district court’s broad sentencing discretion “is not a limitless grant of power,” State v. Warren , and appellate courts may reverse a presumptive sentence if warranted by “compelling circumstances.”

“This court will generally not exercise its authority to modify a sentence within the presumptive range ‘absent compelling circumstances.’” Delk, d at 428 ().

“[I]t would be a rare case which would warrant reversal” of a presumptive sentence, and appellate courts should modify presumptive sentences only under “compelling circumstances,”

Appellate courts “generally will not interfere with 10 sentences that are within the presumptive sentence range” and will “modify a sentence that is within the presumptive sentence range” only when there are “compelling circumstances.”

d 140, 142 (Minn. 1982).

This court will generally not exercise its authority to modify a sentence within the presumptive range “absent compelling circumstances.”