Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 673 N.W.2d 528.

18 citing documents.

MSP Apartments, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Because standing is a jurisdictional issue that may be raised at any time, we reject the attorney general’s forfeiture argument.
In re the Marriage of: Emily Lynn Rasmussen v. Nicholas Steven Rasmussen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Emily Lynn Rasmussen v. Nicholas Steven Rasmussen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
378.01 (noting review may be taken from final ruling of CSM “or” district court’s order deciding motion for review); n.2 (Minn. App. 2004).
In re the Marriage of: Linsey Lee Milbrandt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 528, 530 n.2 (Minn. App. 2004).
County of Dakota, ex rel., Michelle Marie Hinz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tiffany Elizabeth Jean Banerjee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Dennis J. Arvig, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Etsegenet Setegn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 528, 530 n.2 (Minn. App. 2004 ) (explaining appellate review of decisions made in the expedited child-support process).
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick , n.2 (Minn. Ap p. 2004) (emphasis added).
County of Ramsey, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-1612 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick , n.2 (Minn. App. 2004) (explaining appellate review of decisions made in the expedited child-support process).
Lisa Jensen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N When “a party moves for revie w of the CSM’s original decision, the reviewing authority conducts an ‘independent review’ of that decision.” n.2 (Minn. App. 2004) (quoting Minn. R. Gen.
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
530 n. 2 (Minn.App.2004).
Marriage of Welsh v. Welsh 775 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Welsh v. Welsh 775 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
530 n. 2 (Minn.App.2004) (explaining appellate review of CSM decisions).
In Re the Marriage of Rose v. Rose 765 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Marriage of Rose v. Rose 765 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
530 n. 2 (Minn.App.2004).