Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Burbach, 706 N.W.2d 484.

178 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We undertake a de novo review to determi ne whether a search or s eizure is justified by reasonable suspicion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 484, 487 (Minn. 2005).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We undertake a de novo review to determine whether a search or seizure is justified by reasonable suspicion or by probable cause.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 484, 487 (Minn. 2005).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
He also contends that slumping in one’s seat may be merely “nervous behavior” and that courts are “reluctant to rely on nervous behavior as evidence to support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We review de novo whether a stop is supported by reasonable suspicion, but review for clear error “the factual determinations underlying [that] legal conclusion[].” 5 ().
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Burbach , (M inn.
State v. Gayles 915 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Gayles 915 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Burbach , , 487 n.1 (Minn. 2005) ; see State v. Wiltgen , , 566 n.3 (Minn. 2007) (noting that the suppression of evidence *10 used to enhance a driving-while-impaired charge satisfied the critical-impact requirement because it directly led to the dismissal of the enhanced charge).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick 899 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- 91 (Minn. 2005) (concluding that following a traffic stop, a defendant’s nervous demeanor was not sufficient by itself to provide reasonable suspicion to search his vehicle).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Louis Puttbrese Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Louis Puttbrese Minn. Ct. App. 2017
9 -90 (Minn. 2005) (concluding that a tip unsupported by evidence of reliability and a speeding violation, combined with driver’s nervousness, were insufficient to support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of illegal drug activity); (“While an officer’s
State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Sean Adam Peake Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Sean Adam Peake Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. William Henderson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. William Henderson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Where the facts are stipulated, our review is “entirely de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Where the facts are undisputed, “our review is entirely de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Creighton Thomas Penn Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Creighton Thomas Penn Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kurt Matthew Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2016