Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Burbach, 706 N.W.2d 484.

178 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Carl Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We undertake a de novo review to determi ne whether a search or s eizure is justified by reasonable suspicion.”
State of Minnesota v. Ezekiel John Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Resa Lynn Gauthier Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jordan Germaine McCray Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Dillon Farkon Howard, Jr Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Rafeti Alexander de Sala de la Rosa Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Robert Francisco Meffert Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Derek William Jung Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 484, 487 (Minn. 2005).
State of Minnesota v. Jomar Londo Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We undertake a de novo review to determine whether a search or seizure is justified by reasonable suspicion or by probable cause.”
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Lee Kapus Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 484, 487 (Minn. 2005).
State of Minnesota v. Susie Edana Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Heriberto Dominguez Bravo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jose Salud Botello Vargas Minn. Ct. App. 2020
He also contends that slumping in one’s seat may be merely “nervous behavior” and that courts are “reluctant to rely on nervous behavior as evidence to support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity.”
State of Minnesota v. Dwight Lee Docken Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Nehemiah Jovan Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Guytrell Edward Hawkins Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. William Aaron Wozna, III Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Timothy Barnett Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Michael Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We review de novo whether a stop is supported by reasonable suspicion, but review for clear error “the factual determinations underlying [that] legal conclusion[].” 5 ().
State of Minnesota v. Nathan William Quast Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Burbach , (M inn.
State v. Gayles 915 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Gayles 915 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Burbach , , 487 n.1 (Minn. 2005) ; see State v. Wiltgen , , 566 n.3 (Minn. 2007) (noting that the suppression of evidence *10 used to enhance a driving-while-impaired charge satisfied the critical-impact requirement because it directly led to the dismissal of the enhanced charge).
State of Minnesota v. Deron Shandell Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Michael Raymond Burke Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Blane Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Michael Eugene Tabaka Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick 899 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kartaris Lashawn Harris Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jorge Armando Benavides Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Solon LaBatte Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- 91 (Minn. 2005) (concluding that following a traffic stop, a defendant’s nervous demeanor was not sufficient by itself to provide reasonable suspicion to search his vehicle).
State of Minnesota v. Craig Edward Dauffenbach Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Louis Puttbrese Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Louis Puttbrese Minn. Ct. App. 2017
9 -90 (Minn. 2005) (concluding that a tip unsupported by evidence of reliability and a speeding violation, combined with driver’s nervousness, were insufficient to support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of illegal drug activity); (“While an officer’s
State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Sean Adam Peake Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Sean Adam Peake Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. William Henderson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. William Henderson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Where the facts are stipulated, our review is “entirely de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Where the facts are undisputed, “our review is entirely de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Creighton Thomas Penn Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Creighton Thomas Penn Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kurt Matthew Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2016