Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc., 721 N.W.2d 340.

483 citing documents.

Stephanie Neely v. Bemidji Candlewood LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Edward L. Foster-Graham v. Fellowship Recovery, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Whether an employee committed employment misconduct is a mixed question of fact and law.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Michael Nikiforakis v. Twin Cities Motorcycles, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ann Anderson v. Cooperative Response Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Shakitha Jones v. V & J Employment Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Antonio F. Bragg v. Fairchild Equipment, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1a(a) (2024); see also Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc .
Heidi Long v. PM Staffing, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Christopher S. Chaudhry v. Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Jessica L. Coyne v. Dollar General, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The difficulty with her argument is that we do not reweigh the ULJ’s credibility findings, see Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., and the ULJ here found that Coyne quit her position voluntarily rather than because of Dollar General’s alleged improper workplace pressure.
Renae Lynn Hagen v. Coast to Coast Logistics, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Whether an employee committed a particular act is a question of fact, and appellate courts “will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them .” Skarhus v. Davanni ’s Inc., d 340, 344 (Minn. App. 2006).
Steven A. Franklin v. C&C Logistics, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
6 We afford “deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Fredric A. Wilson v. Jerry’s Enterprises, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Shelley Schlichting v. American Legion - St Francis Post 622, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni ’s Inc., see also Wilson v. Mortg.
Chad Wosmek v. City of Fifty Lakes, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., .
Colton Seelye v. Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kenneth M. Kuller v. TVI, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kenneth M. Kuller v. TVI, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Renee Raygor v. Stewart & Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Renee Raygor v. Stewart & Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
[and] we will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., d 340, 344 (Minn. App. 2006) (citations omitted).
Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Tamer K. Embaby v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tamer K. Embaby v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Valerie Coykendall v. EquiMed Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Valerie Coykendall v. EquiMed Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Jennifer Esposito v. W. Peyton Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Teresa McDonald v. Monarch Bus Service, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Dr. Edward Bello v. University of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Skarhus v. Davanni ’s Inc., d 340, 344 (Minn. App. 2006).
Joe J. Bezdicek v. Northco Construction, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Robert Salvaggio v. Prominent Technology, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Sisay N. Beri v. Transit Team, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
[and] we will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Vangyi Chongtoua v. Bdote Learning Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
8 determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Jeffrey Zoss v. Collibra, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Curtis Ford v. APG Cash Drawer, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(quoting Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., ).
Andre Binns v. Gopher Resource, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. , (quotation omitted) ; see also Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.
Jason F. Hansen v. In’Tech Industries, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Marcel Vaudrin v. Tri-Valley Opportunity Council, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ruth Jamison v. Youable Emotional Health, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
stimony to be more credible because it was “straightforward and plausible” while Jamison’s testimony was “exaggerated at times,” for example, by claiming that “there were multiple 30-day demos and the program cut out every 30 minutes throughout 6 her employment.” “Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Bryan Boysen v. Independent School District 2172, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc., (providing that this court defers to credibility determinations by the ULJ).
In the Matter of: Suad Mohamoud Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2 We note that “[a] reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and will reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Michael B. Scott v. Jerry’s Enterprises, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Michael B. Scott v. Jerry’s Enterprises, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Because we defer to the ULJ’s credibility determinations, Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., we reject Scott’s contention that the ULJ’s findings were erroneous.
Elizabeth Young v. Coborn’s Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Elizabeth Young v. Coborn’s Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (providing that this court defers to credibility decisions by the ULJ).
In the Matter of: Benita White Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Benita White Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We review a ULJ’s findings of fact “in the light most favorable to the decision.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Christine A. Koch v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Dennis Freeman v. Kelber Catering, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether an employee committed employment misconduct is a mixed question of fact and law.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Tyler Leibfried v. City of Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Noo Vang v. Mo’s Tropical Market, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citation omitted).