Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ganpat, 732 N.W.2d 232.

23 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To proceed to trial, “[t]he state must show the defendant’s competence by a fair preponderance of the evidence.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Ganpat , d 232, 240 (Minn. 2007) (holding that even though Ganpat was not given his requested medications, may have been intellectually low functioning, and had no prior experience with the criminal jus tice system, he voluntarily waived his right to remain silent); Camacho, d at 169 (holding that evidence of borderline
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The state supreme court has characterized th e standard of appellate review of the district court’s competency finding this way, rephrasing a characterization it made ten years earlier: We independently review the record to determine if the district court gave “proper weight” to the evidence produced and if “its finding of competency is adequately supported by the record.” (d 276, 283 (Minn. 1997)).
State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
Criticized State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
On appeal, Curtis challenged the district court's competency determination, arguing that the court failed to place the burden of proof on the State as required by State v. Ganpat
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
On review of a comp etency determination, an appellate court “independently review[s] the record to determine if the district court gave proper weight to the evidence produced and if its finding of competency is adequately supported by the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
On appeal, “[w]e independently review the record to determine if the district court gave proper weight to the evidence produced and if its finding of competency is adequately supported by the record.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jason DeWayne Kirk Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason DeWayne Kirk Minn. Ct. App. 2015
242 (Minn. 2007) (holding that a defendant’s confession was voluntary when an investigator commented that he guessed the defendant had decided to “do the right thing for your family”).
State v. Ortega 798 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 2011
State v. Ortega 798 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 2011
Bonga v. State 797 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 2011
Bonga v. State 797 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 2011
State v. Anderson 789 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2010
State v. Anderson 789 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2010
Ganpat v. State 746 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2008
Ganpat v. State 746 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2008
On direct appeal, in which he was represented by counsel, Ganpat argued “that the district court erred (1) by concluding that he was competent to stand trial and (2) denying his motion to suppress statements he made to police.”
State v. Farrah 735 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 2007