Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kerr v. Kerr, 770 N.W.2d 567.

34 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A24-0675 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Whether a nonmarital interest has 10 been traced is also a question of fact.” (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Jerry Arthur McDonald, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: William T. Bienemann, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Elizabeth Solinsky, n/k/a Jessica Elizabeth Grimm, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And “[w]hen marital and nonmarital assets have been commingled, the party asserting the nonmarital claim must adequately trace the nonmarital funds in order to establish their nonmarital character.”
In re the Marriage of: Janie Warren Berg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Varvara Viktorovna Tishchenko, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A19-1182 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether a nonmarital interest has been traced is also a question of fact.”
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that “[w]hen marital and nonmarital assets have been co mmingled, the party asserting the nonmarital claim must adequately trace the nonmarital funds in order to establish their nonmarital character”).
In re the Marriage of: Aaron Di Luong, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A nonmarital interest in property may be established on the basis of credible testimony.” Kerr v. Kerr
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Whether a nonmarital interest has been traced is also a question of fact.” Kerr v. Kerr , (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ann Bersaw, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether property is marital or nonmarital is a question of law we review de novo, but we will disturb the district court’s underlying factual findings only if they are clearly erroneous.” d 567, 569 (Minn. App. 2009).
In re the Marriage of: Fadumo Salad, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Danielle M. Kerr, n/k/a Danielle M. Dubois, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
12 clearly erroneous.” Kerr v. Kerr , (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Lana Michelle Kerola v. Greg William Kerola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Lana Michelle Kerola v. Greg William Kerola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- 71 (Minn. App. 2009), in which this court concluded that when a husband and wife refinanced their homestead, the resulting decrease in equity was attributable to the marital portion of the equity and did not diminish the wife’s nonmarital interest.
In re the Marriage of: Jacob Anthony Pulsifer v. Julie Ann Pulsifer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jacob Anthony Pulsifer v. Julie Ann Pulsifer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
a question of fact.” d 567, 571 (Minn. App. 2009).
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A nonmarital interest in property may be established on the basis of credible testimony.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015